Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Oct 22;6(20):e141664.
doi: 10.1172/jci.insight.141664.

A systematic review of geographic indices of disadvantage with implications for older adults

Affiliations

A systematic review of geographic indices of disadvantage with implications for older adults

William R Buckingham et al. JCI Insight. .

Abstract

BACKGROUNDNeighborhood-level socioeconomic disadvantage has wide-ranging impacts on health outcomes, particularly in older adults. Although indices of disadvantage are a widely used tool, research conducted to date has not codified a set of standard variables that should be included in these indices for the United States. The objective of this study was to conduct a systematic review of literature describing the construction of geographic indices of neighborhood-level disadvantage and to summarize and distill the key variables included in these indices. We also sought to demonstrate the utility of these indices for understanding neighborhood-level disadvantage in older adults.METHODSWe conducted a systematic review of existing indices in the English-language literature.RESULTSWe identified 6021 articles, of which 130 met final study inclusion criteria. Our review identified 7 core domains across the surveyed papers, including income, education, housing, employment, neighborhood structure, demographic makeup, and health. Although not universally present, the most prevalent variables included in these indices were education and employment.CONCLUSIONIdentifying these 7 core domains is a key finding of this review. These domains should be considered for inclusion in future neighborhood-level disadvantage indices, and at least 5 domains are recommended to improve the strength of the resulting index. Targeting specific domains offers a path forward toward the construction of a new US-specific index of neighborhood disadvantage with health policy applications. Such an index will be especially useful for characterizing the life-course impact of lived disadvantage in older adults.

Keywords: Aging; Epidemiology.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest: The authors have declared that no conflict of interest exists.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Article selection flowchart.

References

    1. Robert SA. Socioeconomic position and health: the independent contribution of community socioeconomic context. Annu Rev Sociol. 1999;25(1):489–516. doi: 10.1146/annurev.soc.25.1.489. - DOI
    1. Fuentes M, et al. The association among neighborhood socioeconomic status, race and chronic pain in black and white older adults. J Natl Med Assoc. 2007;99(10):1160–1169. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Besser LM, et al. Neighborhood environment and cognition in older adults: a systematic review. Am J Prev Med. 2017;53(2):241–251. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2017.02.013. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lo AX, et al. Neighborhood disadvantage and life-space mobility are associated with incident falls in community-dwelling older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2016;64(11):2218–2225. doi: 10.1111/jgs.14353. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ludwig J, et al. Neighborhood effects on the long-term well-being of low-income adults. Science. 2012;337(6101):1505–1510. doi: 10.1126/science.1224648. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types