Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Sep 21;16(9):e0257572.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0257572. eCollection 2021.

Global sales and operations planning: A multinational manufacturing company perspective

Marcelo Xavier Seeling  1 , Tobias Kreuter  2 , Luiz Felipe Scavarda  1 , Antônio Márcio Tavares Thomé  1 , Bernd Hellingrath  2
Affiliations

Global sales and operations planning: A multinational manufacturing company perspective

Marcelo Xavier Seeling et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to analyse the global Sales and Operations Planning (S&OP) process and investigate the steps to support consolidated business planning in worldwide operations and large-scale supply chains. The paper conducts a case study at a multinational manufacturing company applying an abductive approach. It combines the deductive logic from theory and the inductive logic from field observation in an attempt to elaborate further on theory on global S&OP. The analysis is structured and guided by a novel framework for global S&OP, which is developed based on the theoretical background and the case study findings. The research findings characterise the S&OP process for global operations and identify challenges related to the need to synchronise the subsidiaries' S&OP efforts worldwide to deal with different contingencies of these subsidiaries, and to manage and analyse a large amount of information gathered. The research reveals how the subsidiaries' performance is analysed by top executives along the global S&OP process, feeding strategic initiatives in the organisation and identifying business opportunities like benchmarking among subsidiaries, synergies with other management practices, and global gains. This paper offers a novel investigation of the global steps on S&OP in a real-life setting, offering a well-documented characterisation of the process that goes beyond the traditional local approach. Moreover, it is the first study to reveal challenges and expected outcomes of such a global perspective for S&OP. The theoretical advancements of S&OP research offered herein aid scholars, opening avenues for middle-range theorising, highlighting the cross-disciplinary nature of the domain, and discussing the use of concepts from related disciplines like Economics, Psychology, and Information Systems. The research findings can also assist executives, especially from multinational manufacturers, in their efforts to consolidate global planning.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. S&OP building blocks (Adapted from Thomé et al. [10]).
Fig 2
Fig 2. S&OP local and global process steps (Adapted from Wallace and Stahl [26]).
Fig 3
Fig 3. Research roadmap applying an abductive approach.
Fig 4
Fig 4. Global S&OP framework.
Fig 5
Fig 5. Global S&OP at the case study company.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Fachini RF, Esposto KF, and Camargo VCB. A framework for development of advanced planning and scheduling (APS) systems in glass container industry. J. Manuf. Technol. Manag. 2018; 29(3): 570–587.
    1. Jonsson P, Kaipia R, Barratt M. The future of S&OP: dynamic complexity, ecosystems and resilience. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management. 2021; 51(6): 553–565. 10.1108/IJPDLM-07-2021-452. - DOI
    1. Barbosa MW, Vicente ADLC, Ladeira MB, Oliveira MPVD. Managing supply chain resources with Big Data Analytics: a systematic review. Int. J. Logist. Res. Appl. 2018; 21(3):177–200.
    1. Ferreira FAL, Scavarda LF, Ceryno PS, Leiras A. Supply chain risk analysis: a shipbuilding industry case. Int. J. Logist. Res. Appl. 2018; 21(5): 542–55.
    1. Jonsson P, Holmström J. The future of supply chain planning: Closing the gaps between practice and promise. Int. J. Phys. Distrib. Logist. Manag. 2016; 46(1): 62–8.

Publication types

MeSH terms