Quantifying surgical skill in macular surgery
- PMID: 34549889
- DOI: 10.1111/aos.15023
Quantifying surgical skill in macular surgery
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate the relationship between patient outcome and surgical experience by developing an objective quality measure of macular hole surgery based on forceps damage to the inner retina.
Methods: We retrospectively examined 3 macular hole case series >1 year after pars plana vitrectomy, internal limiting membrane peeling and gas tamponade. The patients were operated by (1) a novice surgeon (<20 cases), (2) an intermediate (150+ cases) and (3) an experienced surgeon (2000+ cases). Primary outcome was inner retinal volume defect as segmented from optical coherence tomography (GCL++: thickness from internal limiting membrane to inner plexiform layer). Secondary outcome was retinal function measured by confocal microperimetry using a custom scanning protocol.
Results: Thirty-two patients were examined: 11, 10 and 11 patients in the novice, intermediate and experienced surgeon group, respectively. Median GCL++ volume defect was 23.68 × 106 μm3 (IQR: 22.77 × 106 -44.81 × 106 μm3 ), 8.42 × 106 μm3 (IQR: 4.86 × 106 -10.03 × 106 μm3 ) and 3.55 × 106 μm3 (IQR: 1.44 × 103 -7.94 × 106 μm3 ) in the novice, intermediate and experienced surgeon group, respectively (p = 0.0004). The novice surgeon volume defect differed significantly from the intermediate and experienced surgeon (p = 0.016 and p = 0.0002, respectively). A subset of 12 patients underwent microperimetry measurements demonstrating correlation between inner retinal volume defect and reduced retinal sensitivity (p = 0.02).
Conclusions: Forceps induced inner retinal damage commonly occurs during initiation of internal limiting membrane peeling in macular hole surgery. Damage to the structure and function of the inner retina seems to correlate to surgical experience.
Keywords: ILM peeling; macular hole; surgical training; vitreoretinal surgery.
© 2021 Acta Ophthalmologica Scandinavica Foundation. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
References
-
- Chatziralli IP, Theodossiadis PG & Steel DHW (2018): Internal limiting membrane peeling in macular hole surgery; why, when, and how? Retina 38: 870-882.
-
- Clark A, Balducci N, Pichi F, Veronese C, Morara M, Torrazza C & Ciardella AP (2012): Swelling of the arcuate nerve fiber layer after internal limiting membrane peeling. Retina 32: 1608-1613.
-
- Davids K, Button C & Bennett S (2008): Dynamics of Skill Acquisition - A Constraints-led Approach. Champaign, IL, USA: Human Kinetics.
-
- Diaz RI, Randolph JC, Sigler EJ & Calzada JI (2014): Intraoperative grasp site correlation with morphologic changes in retinal nerve fiber layer after internal limiting membrane peeling. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina 45: 45-49.
-
- Karacorlu M, Karacorlu S & Ozdemir H (2003): Iatrogenic punctate chorioretinopathy after internal limiting membrane peeling. Am J Ophthalmol 135: 178-182.
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous