Performing Meta-analyses with Very Few Studies
- PMID: 34550585
- DOI: 10.1007/978-1-0716-1566-9_5
Performing Meta-analyses with Very Few Studies
Abstract
This chapter contains a methodological framework for choosing a model for the meta-analysis of very few studies and selecting an estimation method for the chosen model by means of study characteristics and by comparing results yielded by different approaches. When the results are inconclusive between different estimation methods, it might be the best solution to refrain from a quantitative meta-analysis but to summarize the study results by means of a qualitative evidence synthesis.
Keywords: Confidence interval; Evidence synthesis; Fixed-effect model; Meta-analysis; Prediction interval; Random-effects model; Very few studies.
© 2022. Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.
References
-
- Borenstein M, Hedges LV, Higgins JPT, Rothstein HR (2009) Introduction to meta-analysis. Wiley, Chichester - DOI
-
- Borenstein M, Hedges LV, Higgins JPT, Rothstein HR (2010) A basic introduction to fixed-effect and random-effects models for meta-analysis. Res Synth Methods 1(2):97–111. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.12 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- DerSimonian R, Laird NM (1986) Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials 7(3):177–188 - DOI
-
- Bender R, Friede T, Koch A, Kuss O, Schlattmann P, Schwarzer G, Skipka G (2018) Methods for evidence synthesis in the case of very few studies. Res Synth Methods 9(3):382–392. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1297 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Cornell JE, Mulrow CD, Localio R, Stack CB, Meibohm AR, Guallar E, Goodman SN (2014) Random-effects meta-analysis of inconsistent effects: a time for change. Ann Intern Med 160(4):267–270 - DOI
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources