Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2021 Sep 22;21(1):1004.
doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06980-6.

Socio-demographic, clinical and service use determinants associated with HIV related stigma among people living with HIV/AIDS: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Bahram Armoon  1   2 , Peter Higgs  3 , Marie-Josée Fleury  4   5   6 , Amir-Hossien Bayat  7 , Ladan Fattah Moghaddam  8 , Azadeh Bayani  9 , Yadollah Fakhri  10
Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Socio-demographic, clinical and service use determinants associated with HIV related stigma among people living with HIV/AIDS: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Bahram Armoon et al. BMC Health Serv Res. .

Abstract

Background: Defining HIV-related stigma (HRS) can be problematic due to structural inequalities, cultural differences, discrimination by health care providers and the limitations of tools measuring stigma for people living with HIV (PLWH). This meta-analysis aimed to determine self-reported HRS and its association with socio-demographic and clinical determinants.

Methods: PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, PsycInfo, SciELO and Cochrane electronic databases were searched and after reviewing for study duplicates, the full-text of selected articles were assessed for eligibility using Population, Intervention, Comparator, Outcomes criteria. We used fixed and random-effects meta-analysis models to estimate the pooled prevalence, pooled odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals.

Results: Thirty-one studies containing 10,475 participants met the eligibility criteria. Among the potential risk factors: age > 30 years (OR = 0.93, 95%CI = 0.86, 1), living with a spouse (OR = 0.07, 95%CI = 0.02, 0.17), CD4 count < 200 (OR = 0.5, 95% CI = 0.31, 0.68), medication adherence (OR = 0.96, 95%CI = 0.94, 0.99), poor access to care (OR = 0.79, 95%CI = 0.65, 0.93), time since diagnosis, and accessibility to care (OR = 0.37, 95%CI = 0.11, 0.86) were all significantly associated with self-reported HIV stigma among PWLH.

Conclusion: Stigma is correlated with numerous negative consequences in marginalised populations including PLWH. Considering the negative association that stigma has on HIV prevention and treatment targeted evidence-based stigma reduction interventions are recommended. Interventions that are focused on a particular group, such as healthcare professionals are warranted. Rigorously designed studies with specific and validated outcome measures associated with targeted interventions may help to improve the reduction of HRS for PLWH.

Keywords: CD4 count; HIV-related stigma; Medication adherence; Time since diagnosis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The corresponding author BA is an Editorial Board Member for BMC Health Services Research. The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
PRISMA flow diagram
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Forest plots for the association between being female and HIV related stigma among PLWH
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Forest plots for the association between non-literate and primary education and HIV related stigma among PLWH
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Forest plots for the association between income (< 100$) and HIV related stigma among PLWH
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Forest plots for the association between previous HIV testing and HIV related stigma among PLWH
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Forest plots for the association between age > 30 years and HIV related stigma among PLWH
Fig. 7
Fig. 7
Forest plots for the association between living with spouse and HIV related stigma among PLWH
Fig. 8
Fig. 8
Forest plots for the association between CD4 count < 200 and HIV related stigma among PLWH
Fig. 9
Fig. 9
Forest plots for the association between medication adherence and HIV related stigma among PLWH
Fig. 10
Fig. 10
Forest plots for the association between poor access to care and HIV related stigma among PLWH
Fig. 11
Fig. 11
Forest plots for the association between of time diagnosis and accessibility to cares and HIV related stigma among PLWH
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Mahajan AP, Sayles JN, Patel VA, Remien RH, Ortiz D, Szekeres G, et al. Stigma in the HIV/AIDS epidemic: a review of the literature and recommendations for the way forward. AIDS (London, England) 2008;22(Suppl 2):S67. doi: 10.1097/01.aids.0000327438.13291.62. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Parker R, Aggleton P. HIV and AIDS-related stigma and discrimination: a conceptual framework and implications for action. Soc Sci Med (1982) 2003;57(1):13–24. doi: 10.1016/S0277-9536(02)00304-0. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Van Brakel WH. Measuring health-related stigma--a literature review. Psychol Health Med. 2006;11(3):307–334. doi: 10.1080/13548500600595160. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Campbell C, Deacon H. Unravelling the contexts of stigma: from internalisation to resistance to change. J Community Appl Soc Psychol. 2006;16(6):411–417. doi: 10.1002/casp.901. - DOI
    1. Bayat A-H, Mohammadi R, Moradi-Joo M, Bayani A, Ahounbar E, Higgs P, et al. HIV and drug related stigma and risk-taking behaviors among people who inject drugs: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Addict Dis. 2020;38(1):71–83. doi: 10.1080/10550887.2020.1718264. - DOI - PubMed