Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2022 Feb;12(2):402-415.
doi: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-21-0697. Epub 2021 Sep 22.

Futibatinib, an Irreversible FGFR1-4 Inhibitor, in Patients with Advanced Solid Tumors Harboring FGF/ FGFR Aberrations: A Phase I Dose-Expansion Study

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Futibatinib, an Irreversible FGFR1-4 Inhibitor, in Patients with Advanced Solid Tumors Harboring FGF/ FGFR Aberrations: A Phase I Dose-Expansion Study

Funda Meric-Bernstam et al. Cancer Discov. 2022 Feb.

Abstract

Futibatinib, a highly selective, irreversible FGFR1-4 inhibitor, was evaluated in a large multihistology phase I dose-expansion trial that enrolled 197 patients with advanced solid tumors. Futibatinib demonstrated an objective response rate (ORR) of 13.7%, with responses in a broad spectrum of tumors (cholangiocarcinoma and gastric, urothelial, central nervous system, head and neck, and breast cancer) bearing both known and previously uncharacterized FGFR1-3 aberrations. The greatest activity was observed in FGFR2 fusion/rearrangement-positive intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ORR, 25.4%). Some patients with acquired resistance to a prior FGFR inhibitor also experienced responses with futibatinib. Futibatinib demonstrated a manageable safety profile. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events were hyperphosphatemia (81.2%), diarrhea (33.5%), and nausea (30.4%). These results formed the basis for ongoing futibatinib phase II/III trials and demonstrate the potential of genomically selected early-phase trials to help identify molecular subsets likely to benefit from targeted therapy. SIGNIFICANCE: This phase I dose-expansion trial demonstrated clinical activity and tolerability of the irreversible FGFR1-4 inhibitor futibatinib across a broad spectrum of FGFR-aberrant tumors. These results formed the rationale for ongoing phase II/III futibatinib trials in cholangiocarcinoma, breast cancer, gastroesophageal cancer, and a genomically selected disease-agnostic population.This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 275.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1. Phase I expansion study design. aIntrahepatic (n = 61) and extrahepatic (n = 3) CCA. bSarcoma (n = 6); colorectal cancer (n = 5); endometrial cancer (n = 3); esophageal cancer (n = 3); gallbladder cancer (n = 3); head and neck cancer (n = 2); adrenal cortical cancer, lung cancer, mesothelioma, ovarian cancer, pancreatic cancer, and thyroid cancer (n = 1 each); and primary unknown (n = 3). cBreast cancer, gallbladder cancer, primary CNS cancer, sarcoma, urothelial cancer, and thyroid cancer (n = 1 each), and primary unknown (n = 2). iCCA, intrahepatic CCA; QD, once daily.
Figure 1.
Phase I expansion study design. aIntrahepatic (n = 61) and extrahepatic (n = 3) CCA. bSarcoma (n = 6); colorectal cancer (n = 5); endometrial cancer (n = 3); esophageal cancer (n = 3); gallbladder cancer (n = 3); head and neck cancer (n = 2); adrenal cortical cancer, lung cancer, mesothelioma, ovarian cancer, pancreatic cancer, and thyroid cancer (n = 1 each); and primary unknown (n = 3). cBreast cancer, gallbladder cancer, primary CNS cancer, sarcoma, urothelial cancer, and thyroid cancer (n = 1 each), and primary unknown (n = 2). iCCA, intrahepatic CCA; QD, once daily.
Figure 2. Individual response and treatment outcome by tumor type in patients who received futibatinib 20 mg once daily. This figure shows individual treatment outcomes organized by tumor type, color coded for FGFR aberration in patients who received futibatinib 20 mg once daily (n = 170). RECIST v1.1 criteria were used for tumor response assessment for all tumor types except CNS tumors, for which RANO criteria were used to assess tumor response. Several patients (n = 14; indicated with a–f) had more than one type of FGF/FGFR aberration. In addition to the FGF/FGFR aberration indicated by the color-coded bars, patients had (a) FGFR2 F/R, (b) FGF3/4/19 amp, (c) FGFR3 F/R, (d) FGFR3 mut, (e) FGF3/19 amp, or (f) FGFR2/3 amp. amp, amplification; FGFRi, FGFR inhibitor; F/R, fusion/rearrangement; mut, point mutation; NE, not evaluable; PD, progressive disease.
Figure 2.
Individual response and treatment outcome by tumor type in patients who received futibatinib 20 mg once daily. This figure shows individual treatment outcomes organized by tumor type, color coded for FGFR aberration in patients who received futibatinib 20 mg once daily (n = 170). RECIST v1.1 criteria were used for tumor response assessment for all tumor types except CNS tumors, for which RANO criteria were used to assess tumor response. Several patients (n = 14; indicated with a–f) had more than one type of FGF/FGFR aberration. In addition to the FGF/FGFR aberration indicated by the color-coded bars, patients had (a) FGFR2 F/R, (b) FGF3/4/19 amp, (c) FGFR3 F/R, (d) FGFR3 mut, (e) FGF3/19 amp, or (f) FGFR2/3 amp. amp, amplification; FGFRi, FGFR inhibitor; F/R, fusion/rearrangement; mut, point mutation; NE, not evaluable; PD, progressive disease.
Figure 3. Individual response and treatment outcome by FGFR aberration in patients who received futibatinib 20 mg once daily. The figure shows individual treatment outcomes organized by FGFR aberration type, color coded for tumor type in patients who received futibatinib 20 mg once daily. RECIST v1.1 criteria were used for tumor response assessment for all tumor types except for CNS tumors, for which RANO criteria were used. Several patients (n = 14) had more than one type of FGF/FGFR aberration and are represented in each relevant FGFR aberration category. These patients are indicated with the letters a–n, with each letter representing an individual patient.
Figure 3.
Individual response and treatment outcome by FGFR aberration in patients who received futibatinib 20 mg once daily. The figure shows individual treatment outcomes organized by FGFR aberration type, color coded for tumor type in patients who received futibatinib 20 mg once daily. RECIST v1.1 criteria were used for tumor response assessment for all tumor types except for CNS tumors, for which RANO criteria were used. Several patients (n = 14) had more than one type of FGF/FGFR aberration and are represented in each relevant FGFR aberration category. These patients are indicated with the letters a–n, with each letter representing an individual patient.
Figure 4. Time on treatment by best response in patients with CCA who received (A) futibatinib 20 mg once daily or (B) futibatinib 16 mg once daily. Time on treatment (color coded by best overall response) of each patient with CCA who received futibatinib at (A) 20 mg once daily (n = 64) or (B) 16 mg once daily (n = 19). NE, not evaluable; PD, progressive disease; QD, once daily.
Figure 4.
Time on treatment by best response in patients with CCA who received (A) futibatinib 20 mg once daily or (B) futibatinib 16 mg once daily. Time on treatment (color coded by best overall response) of each patient with CCA who received futibatinib at (A) 20 mg once daily (n = 64) or (B) 16 mg once daily (n = 19). NE, not evaluable; PD, progressive disease; QD, once daily.

References

    1. Turner N, Grose R. Fibroblast growth factor signalling: from development to cancer. Nat Rev Cancer 2010;10:116–29. - PubMed
    1. Chae YK, Ranganath K, Hammerman PS, Vaklavas C, Mohindra N, Kalyan Aet al. . Inhibition of the fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) pathway: the current landscape and barriers to clinical application. Oncotarget 2017;8:16052–74. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Helsten T, Elkin S, Arthur E, Tomson BN, Carter J, Kurzrock R. The FGFR landscape in cancer: analysis of 4,853 tumors by next-generation sequencing. Clin Cancer Res 2016;22:259–67. - PubMed
    1. Abou-Alfa GK, Sahai V, Hollebecque A, Vaccaro G, Melisi D, Al-Rajabi Ret al. . Pemigatinib for previously treated, locally advanced or metastatic cholangiocarcinoma: a multicentre, open-label, phase 2 study. Lancet Oncol 2020;21:671–84. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chae YK, Hong F, Vaklavas C, Cheng HH, Hammerman P, Mitchell EPet al. . Phase II study of AZD4547 in patients with tumors harboring aberrations in the FGFR pathway: results from the NCI-MATCH trial (EAY131) subprotocol W. J Clin Oncol 2020;38:2407–17. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms