Displaced three and four part proximal humeral fractures: prospective controlled randomized open-label two-arm study comparing intramedullary nailing and locking plate
- PMID: 34554308
- DOI: 10.1007/s00264-021-05217-9
Displaced three and four part proximal humeral fractures: prospective controlled randomized open-label two-arm study comparing intramedullary nailing and locking plate
Abstract
Purpose: The aim of this study was (1) to compare clinical and radiological outcomes of 3- and 4-part proximal humeral fractures using either IMN or LP (2) and to report complications related to each technique.
Methods: A prospective controlled randomized open-label two-arm study was performed. Ninety-nine consecutive adult patients with a 3- and 4-part displaced acute proximal humeral fractures were randomized to be treated with IMN (n = 49) or LP (n = 50). Constant, ASES and SST scores were recorded by the surgeon. Range of motion was evaluated. A visual analog scale (VAS) was used to assess shoulder pain. Complications and revision surgeries were reported.
Results: Eighty-five patients were analyzed, nine were lost, and five died during the follow-up period. The mean age was 73.7 years (± 13.3,, and the mean follow-up was 66 months (± 13.5). At last follow-up, VAS was lower in the IMN group (0.9 (± 1.1) vs. 1.9 (± 1.7), p = 0.001). The median Constant score was significantly higher in the IMN group (81.6 (± 10.9) points) vs. in the LP group (75.6 (± 19.5) points) (p = 0.043), and ASES score was also significantly higher in the IMN group (86.3 (± 9.5) vs. 75.2 (± 19.6), p = 0.001). There was no difference in the range of motion or SST scores between the two groups. Complications were seen higher in the LP group (9 (21%) vs. 22 (52%), p = 0.003). Revision surgery was higher in the LP group (37% vs. 21%).
Conclusion: Satisfactory results were accomplished in both groups according to the reported clinical outcomes. Complication and revision rates were higher in LP group.
Keywords: Fracture; Humerus; Nail; Necrosis; Plate.
© 2021. The Author(s) under exclusive licence to SICOT aisbl.
Comment in
-
Comment on the article by Boyer et al.: Displaced three- and four-part proximal humeral fractures: prospective controlled randomized open label two-arm study comparing intramedullary nailing and locking plate.Int Orthop. 2022 Apr;46(4):923-924. doi: 10.1007/s00264-022-05301-8. Epub 2022 Jan 7. Int Orthop. 2022. PMID: 34993557 No abstract available.
References
-
- Court-Brown CM, Caesar B (2006) Epidemiology of adult fractures: a review. Injury 37:691–697. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2006.04.130 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Maravic M, Briot K, Roux C (2014) Burden of proximal humerus fractures in the French National Hospital Database. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 100:931–934. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2014.09.017 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Burkhart KJ, Dietz SO, Bastian L et al (2013) The treatment of proximal humeral fracture in adults. Dtsch Arzteblatt Int 110:591–597. https://doi.org/10.3238/arztebl.2013.0591 - DOI
-
- Roux A, Decroocq L, El Batti S et al (2012) Epidemiology of proximal humerus fractures managed in a trauma center. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res OTSR 98:715–719. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2012.05.013 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Neer C (1970) Displaced proximal humeral fractures: PART II. Treatment of three-part and four-part displacement. J Bone Jt Surg 52:1090–1103 - DOI
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
