Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Feb 1;36(2):44-50.
doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000002215.

Outcomes of Various Antibiotic Cement-Coated Intramedullary Implants on the Treatment of Long Bone Septic Nonunion

Affiliations

Outcomes of Various Antibiotic Cement-Coated Intramedullary Implants on the Treatment of Long Bone Septic Nonunion

Luke A Lopas et al. J Orthop Trauma. .

Abstract

Objective: To determine the effectiveness of various types of antibiotic-coated intramedullary implants in the treatment of septic long bone nonunion.

Design: Retrospective chart review.

Setting: Level 1 trauma center.

Participants: Forty-one patients with septic long bone nonunion treated with an antibiotic cement-coated intramedullary implant.

Intervention: Surgical debridement and placement of a type of antibiotic-coated intramedullary implant.

Main outcome measurements: Union and need for reoperation.

Results: At an average 27-month follow-up (6-104), 27 patients (66%) had a modified radiographic union score of the tibia of 11.5 or greater, 12 patients (29%) a score lower than 11.5, and 2 patients (5%) underwent subsequent amputation. Six patients underwent no further surgical procedures after the index operation. Patients treated with a rigid, locked antibiotic nail achieved earlier weight-bearing (P = 0.001), less frequently required autograft (P = 0.005), and underwent fewer subsequent procedures (average 0.38 vs. 3.60, P = 0.004) than those treated with flexible core antibiotic rods.

Conclusions: Antibiotic-coated intramedullary implants are successful in the treatment of septic nonunions in long bones. In our cohort, rigid, statically locked nails allowed faster rehabilitation, decreased the need for autograft, and decreased the number of additional surgical procedures. Further study is needed to confirm these findings.

Level of evidence: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors report no conflict of interest.

References

    1. Barger J, Fragomen AT, Rozbruch SR. Antibiotic-coated interlocking intramedullary nail for the treatment of long-bone osteomyelitis. JBJS Rev. 2017;5:e5.
    1. Gosselin RA, Roberts I, Gillespie WJ. Antibiotics for preventing infection in open limb fractures. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004;1:CD003764.
    1. Klemm K. Gentamicin-PMMA-beads in treating bone and soft tissue infections (author's transl) [in German]. Zentralbl Chir. 1979;104:934–942.
    1. Reilly RM, Robertson T, O'Toole RV, et al. Are antibiotic nails effective in the treatment of infected tibial fractures?. Injury. 2016;47:2809–2815.
    1. Wasko MK, Borens O. Antibiotic cement nail for the treatment of posttraumatic intramedullary infections of the tibia: midterm results in 10 cases. Injury. 2013;44:1057–1060.

Substances