Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Feb;49(1):22-29.
doi: 10.1111/iji.12558. Epub 2021 Sep 23.

BSHI/BTS guidance on crossmatching before deceased donor kidney transplantation

Affiliations
Review

BSHI/BTS guidance on crossmatching before deceased donor kidney transplantation

S Peacock et al. Int J Immunogenet. 2022 Feb.

Abstract

All UK H&I laboratories and transplant units operate under a single national kidney offering policy, but there have been variations in approach regarding when to undertake the pre-transplant crossmatch test. In order to minimize cold ischaemia times for deceased donor kidney transplantation we sought to find ways to be able to report a crossmatch result as early as possible in the donation process. A panel of experts in transplant surgery, nephrology, specialist nursing in organ donation and H&I (all relevant UK laboratories represented) assessed evidence and opinion concerning five factors that relate to the effectiveness of the crossmatch process, as follows: when the result should be ready for reporting; what level of donor HLA typing is needed; crossmatch sample type and availability; fairness and equity; risks and patient safety. Guidelines aimed at improving practice based on these issues are presented, and we expect that following these will allow H&I laboratories to contribute to reducing CIT in deceased donor kidney transplantation.

Keywords: HLA; antibodies; kidney transplantation; virtual crossmatching.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

All authors participated in the working group, contributed to these guidelines, and have read and approved the final manuscript. SP and DB prepared the following text.

References

    1. Alzahrani, M. , Qahtani, Z. , Harbi, H. , Kebasi, S. , Essa, O. , & Al Attas, R. (2019). Virtual crossmatch: Reality of perception. Transplantation Proceedings, 51(2), 488–491. - PubMed
    1. Atkins, D. , Best, D. , Briss, P. A. , Eccles, M. , Falck‐Ytter, Y. , Flottorp, S. , Guyatt, G. H. , Harbour, R. T. , Haugh, M. C. , Henry, D. , Hill, S. , Jaeschke, R. , Leng, G. , Liberati, A. , Magrini, N. , Mason, J. , Middleton, P. , Mrukowicz, J. , O'Connell, D. , … Zaza, S. (2004). GRADE Working Group 2004 Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ (Clinical Research Ed.), 328(7454), 1490. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bingaman, A. W. , Murphey, C. L. , Palma‐Vargas, J. , & Wright, F. (2008). A virtual crossmatch protocol significantly increases access of highly sensitized patients to deceased donor kidney transplantation. Transplantation, 86(12), 1864–1868. 10.1097/TP.0b013e318191404c - DOI - PubMed
    1. Breimer, M. E. , Rydberg, L. , Jackson, A. M. , Lucas, D. P. , Zachary, A. A. , Melancon, J. K. , Von Visger, J. , Pelletier, R. , Saidman, S. L. , Williams, W. W. , Holgersson, J. , Tydén, G. , Klintmalm, G. K. , Coultrup, S. , Sumitran‐Holgersson, S. , & Grufman, P. (2009). Multicenter evaluation of a novel endothelial cell crossmatch test in kidney transplantation. Transplantation, 87(4), 549–556. 10.1097/TP.0b013e3181949d4e - DOI - PubMed
    1. BSHI & BTS Guideline . The detection and characterisation of clinically relevant antibodies in allotransplantation. July (2015). https://bts.org.uk/wp‐content/uploads/2016/09/06_BTS_BSHI_Antibodies‐1.pdf