Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Sep 23;18(1):190.
doi: 10.1186/s12978-021-01243-3.

Understanding abortion seeking care outside of formal health care settings in Cape Town, South Africa: a qualitative study

Jane Harries  1 , Kristen Daskilewicz  2 , Tshegofatso Bessenaar  3 , Caitlin Gerdts  4
Affiliations

Understanding abortion seeking care outside of formal health care settings in Cape Town, South Africa: a qualitative study

Jane Harries et al. Reprod Health. .

Abstract

Background: Although abortion was legalized in South Africa in 1996, barriers to safe, legal abortion services remain, and women continue to seek abortions outside of the formal healthcare sector. This study explored the decision-making processes that women undertake when faced with an unintended pregnancy, the sources of information used to make their decisions and the factors that contribute to their seeking of informal sector abortion in Cape Town, South Africa.

Methods: We conducted 15 semi-structured in-depth interviews in English with women who had accessed an abortion outside of the formal health care sector. Women were recruited with the assistance of a community-based key informant. Data was analyzed using a thematic analysis approach.

Results: Participants were aware that abortions were legal and accessible in public clinics, however they were concerned that others would find out about their unintended pregnancy and abortion if they went to legal providers. Women were also concerned about judgment and mistreatment from providers during their care. Rather than seek care in the formal sector, women looked past concerns around the safety and effectiveness of informal sector abortions and often relied on their social networks for referrals to informal providers.

Conclusions: The findings highlight the decision-making processes employed by women when seeking abortion services in a setting where abortion is legal and demonstrate the role of institutional and societal barriers to safe abortion access. Abortion service delivery models should adapt to women's needs to enhance the preferences and priorities of those seeking abortion care-including those who prefer facility-based care as well as those who might prefer self-managed medical abortions.

Keywords: Abortion; Decision-making; Informal sector abortions; Out of clinic abortions; Qualitative research; South Africa.

Plain language summary

Although abortion was legalized in South Africa in 1996, barriers to safe, legal abortion services remain, and women continue to seek abortions outside of the formal healthcare sector. This study explored the decision-making processes that women undertake when faced with an unintended pregnancy, who they discuss and seek help from, and the factors that influence their decision to seek an abortion outside of the formal health care sector. We interviewed 15 women who had obtained an abortion outside of the health care sector in Cape Town, South Africa. Women were aware that abortions were legal and available in public clinics, but they were concerned about negative and judgmental attitudes from health care providers even though some women were aware of the possible health safety issues related to seeking an abortion outside of the clinic setting. Abortion services should adapt to women’s needs and offer them options of facility-based care but also self-managed medical abortions under the guidance of health care providers.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Harries J, Constant D. Providing safe abortion services: experiences and perspectives of providers in South Africa. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2020;62:79–89. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2019.05.005. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Favier M, Greenberg JMS, Stevens M. Safe abortion in South Africa: “We have wonderful laws but we don’t have people to implement those laws”. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2018;143(Suppl 4):38–44. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.12676. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Harries J, Cooper D, Strebel A, Colvin CJ. Conscientious objection and its impact on abortion service provision in South Africa: a qualitative study. BMC Reproductive Health. 2014;11(1):16. doi: 10.1186/1742-4755-11-16. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Trueman KA, Magwentshu M. Abortion in a progressive legal environment: the need for vigilance in protecting and promoting access to safe abortion services in South Africa. Am J Public Health. 2013;103:397–399. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2012.301194. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Harrison A, Montgomery ET, Lurie M, Wilkinson D. Barriers to implementing South Africa’s termination of pregnancy act in rural KwaZulu/Natal. Health Policy Plan. 2000;15:424–431. doi: 10.1093/heapol/15.4.424. - DOI - PubMed