Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Feb;88(4):1773-1784.
doi: 10.1111/bcp.15092. Epub 2021 Oct 19.

Healthy volunteers in first-in-human oncology drug development for small molecules

Affiliations
Review

Healthy volunteers in first-in-human oncology drug development for small molecules

Begoña de Las Heras et al. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2022 Feb.

Abstract

This review provides tools to consider the inclusion of healthy volunteers (HVs) in first-in-human (FIH) oncology clinical trials with small molecules, including targeted and immunomodulatory agents, a strategy that was not envisioned with classic chemotherapy. To enable an FIH oncology trial in HVs compared to cancer patients (CPs), a robust nonclinical package must be generated, which includes toxicokinetic and pharmacokinetic studies, as well as more extensive safety pharmacology, toxicology and genotoxicity studies. This strategy could provide an early clinical characterization of the pharmacokinetic parameters and clinical safety profile in the absence of comorbidities and concomitant medication. It also avoids the ethical issue of administrating subtherapeutic doses to CPs, and could potentially help to accelerate the timelines of clinical drug development for patient care. That being said, stakeholders involved in these studies need to proceed with caution, fully understand the regulatory guidance and thoroughly evaluate the benefits and risks. This paper serves to address the regulatory guidance and other considerations needed when using healthy volunteers in early oncology trials.

Keywords: first-in-human; healthy volunteers; nonclinical; oncology; pharmacokinetic; phase 1; safety; toxicity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

N.S. provided consultation or attended advisory boards for AIMM Therapeutics, Boehringer Ingelheim, Ellipses Pharma. N.S. received research grants for the institute from AB Science, Abbvie, Actuate Therapeutics, Amgen, Array, AstraZeneca/MedImmune, Bayer, Blueprint Medicines, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol‐Myers Squibb, Cantargia, CellCentric, Cytovation, Deciphera, Genentech/Roche, GlaxoSmithKline, Incyte, Lilly, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Merus, Molecular Partners, Novartis, Pfizer, Pierre Fabre, Roche, Sanofi, Taiho, Takeda (outside the submitted work). The other authors do not report any conflicts of interest.

References

    1. Simon R, Freidlin B, Rubinstein L, Arbuck SG, Collins J, Christian MC. Accelerated titration designs for phase I clinical trials in oncology. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1997;89(15):1138‐1147. - PubMed
    1. O'Quigley J, Pepe M, Fisher L. Continual reassessment method: a practical design for phase 1 clinical trials in cancer. Biometrics. 1990;46(1):33‐48. - PubMed
    1. Wheeler GM, Mander AP, Bedding A, et al. How to design a dose‐finding study using the continual reassessment method. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2019;19(1):1‐15. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wages NA, Chiuzan C, Panageas KS. Design considerations for early‐phase clinical trials of immune‐oncology agents. J Immunother Cancer. 2018;6(1):1‐10. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ananthakrishnan R, Green S, Chang M, Doros G, Massaro J, LaValley M. Systematic comparison of the statistical operating characteristics of various phase I oncology designs. Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2016;5:34‐48. - PMC - PubMed