Risk factors for obstetric anal sphincter injury recurrence: A systematic review and meta-analysis
- PMID: 34559892
- PMCID: PMC9298380
- DOI: 10.1002/ijgo.13950
Risk factors for obstetric anal sphincter injury recurrence: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Abstract
Background: Women with previous obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIs) are at a higher risk of recurrence in the subsequent pregnancy, which may lead to the development or worsening of anal incontinence. Due to a lack of evidence, few recommendations can be made about the factors that may affect the risk of OASI recurrence.
Objective: We sought to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate potential risk factors for recurrent OASIs.
Search strategy: Studies up to May 2019 were identified from PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and ISI Web of Science.
Selection criteria: Studies assessing the impact of risk factors on OASI recurrence in subsequent pregnancies were included. Reviews, letters to the editor, conference abstracts, book chapters, guidelines, Cochrane reviews, and expert opinions were excluded.
Data collection and analysis: Data were extracted by two independent reviewers. Odds ratio and standardized mean difference were chosen as effect measures. Pooled estimates were calculated using the random-effects model.
Main results: The meta-analysis showed that maternal age, gestational age, occiput posterior presentation, oxytocin augmentation, operative delivery, and shoulder dystocia were associated with the risk of recurrent OASIs in the subsequent delivery.
Conclusion: Prenatal and intrapartum risk factors are associated with recurrence of OASI. PROSPERO registration no. CRD42020178125.
Keywords: anal incontinence; anal sphincter injury; meta-analysis; perineal trauma; systematic review.
© 2021 The Authors. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have no conflicts of interest.
Figures
Comment in
-
Letter to the Editor: Risk factors for obstetric anal sphincter injury recurrence: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2023 Aug;162(2):777-778. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.14939. Epub 2023 Jun 11. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2023. PMID: 37303091 No abstract available.
-
Response: Risk factors for obstetric anal sphincter injury recurrence: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2023 Aug;162(2):779-780. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.14940. Epub 2023 Jun 11. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2023. PMID: 37303097 No abstract available.
References
-
- Laine K, Gissler M, Pirhonen J. Changing incidence of anal sphincter tears in four Nordic countries through the last decades. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2009;146(1):71‐75. - PubMed
-
- Peleg D, Kennedy CM, Merrill D, Zlatnik FJ. Risk of repetition of a severe perineal laceration. Obstet Gynecol. 1999;93(6):1021‐1024. - PubMed
-
- Jangö H, Westergaard HB, Kjaerbye‐Thygesen A, Langhoff‐Roos J, Lauenborg J. Changing incidence of obstetric anal sphincter injuries‐A result of formal prevention programs? Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2019;98(11):1455‐1463. - PubMed
-
- Gurol‐Urganci I, Cromwell DA, Edozien LC, et al. Third‐and fourth‐degree perineal tears among primiparous women in England between 2000 and 2012: time trends and risk factors. BJOG. 2013;120(12):1516‐1525. - PubMed
-
- Ampt AJ, Ford JB, Roberts CL, Morris JM. Trends in obstetric anal sphincter injuries and associated risk factors for vaginal singleton term births in New South Wales 2001–2009. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2013;53(1):9‐16. - PubMed