Barriers to abortion care and incidence of attempted self-managed abortion among individuals searching Google for abortion care: A national prospective study
- PMID: 34560051
- DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2021.09.009
Barriers to abortion care and incidence of attempted self-managed abortion among individuals searching Google for abortion care: A national prospective study
Abstract
Objective: Studies on self-managed abortion conducted at abortion clinics may exclude those facing the greatest barriers to care. We aimed to assess association of attempted self-managed abortion with reported barriers to abortion care.
Study design: We used data from the Google Ads Abortion Access Study, a prospective cohort study that recruited people searching for abortion care on Google between August 2017 and April 2018. We used a stratified sampling design recruiting by state to ensure representation from all 50 states. Participants completed an online baseline survey and follow-up 4 weeks later. We modeled the adjusted odds of attempting self-managed abortion using multivariable logistic regression, with random effects for state of residence. We assessed attempted self-managed abortion at follow-up by asking: "Did you take or try to do any of the following to try to end this pregnancy?" with a closed-ended list of methods.
Results: Among 856 participants with follow-up data, 28% (95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 25%-31%) reported attempting self-managed abortion. Most common methods used were: herbs, supplements, or vitamins (52%); emergency contraception or many contraceptive pills (19%); mifepristone and/or misoprostol (18%); and abdominal or other physical trauma (18%). Participants still seeking abortion at 4 weeks were more likely to attempt self-management (33%) than those planning to carry to term (20%, p < 0.001). Reporting having to keep the abortion a secret, fearing for one's safety/well-being, needing to gather money for travel or the abortion, or living further from an abortion facility as barriers were associated with higher odds of attempts.
Conclusions: Attempted self-managed abortion is higher among people facing barriers to abortion care.
Implications: Reducing financial and distance barriers, such as by removing legal restrictions on abortion, could help reduce attempted self-managed abortion. Additionally, removing restrictions on telehealth for abortion could reduce attempted self-managed abortion. Efforts are needed to permanently remove United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regulations and state policies prohibiting telehealth for medication abortion, thereby allowing individuals to end their pregnancies without a clinic visit.
Keywords: Barriers to care; Herbs and Vitamins; Self-induced abortion; Self-managed abortion; Telehealth; Telemedicine.
Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
"I'll just deal with this on my own": a qualitative exploration of experiences with self-managed abortion in the United States.Reprod Health. 2021 May 4;18(1):91. doi: 10.1186/s12978-021-01142-7. Reprod Health. 2021. PMID: 33947413 Free PMC article.
-
Association Between Distance to an Abortion Facility and Abortion or Pregnancy Outcome Among a Prospective Cohort of People Seeking Abortion Online.JAMA Netw Open. 2022 May 2;5(5):e2212065. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.12065. JAMA Netw Open. 2022. PMID: 35560050 Free PMC article.
-
State abortion policies and Medicaid coverage of abortion are associated with pregnancy outcomes among individuals seeking abortion recruited using Google Ads: A national cohort study.Soc Sci Med. 2021 Apr;274:113747. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.113747. Epub 2021 Feb 6. Soc Sci Med. 2021. PMID: 33642070
-
Self-managed abortion.Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Dec;31(6):435-440. doi: 10.1097/GCO.0000000000000585. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2019. PMID: 31693568 Review.
-
Self-managed abortion: A systematic scoping review.Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2020 Feb;63:87-110. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2019.08.002. Epub 2019 Aug 22. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2020. PMID: 31859163
Cited by
-
Recruiting pregnant people considering abortion: An analysis of differences in participant characteristics by recruitment site across online, abortion fund, and clinic-based sources.Contraception. 2023 Dec;128:110139. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2023.110139. Epub 2023 Aug 30. Contraception. 2023. PMID: 37573997 Free PMC article.
-
Toxicities of herbal abortifacients.Am J Emerg Med. 2023 Jun;68:42-46. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2023.03.005. Epub 2023 Mar 7. Am J Emerg Med. 2023. PMID: 36924751 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Imagining Coat-Hangers and Pills: A Qualitative Exploration of Abortion Beliefs and Attitudes in Hostile Policy Contexts in the United States.Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2025 Mar;57(1):25-35. doi: 10.1111/psrh.12289. Epub 2025 Jan 9. Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2025. PMID: 39789658 Free PMC article.
-
A cross-sectional study examining consideration of self-managed abortion among people seeking facility-based care in the United States.Reprod Health. 2022 Aug 12;19(1):176. doi: 10.1186/s12978-022-01486-8. Reprod Health. 2022. PMID: 35962384 Free PMC article.
-
Health care provider reporting practices related to self-managed abortion.BMC Womens Health. 2023 Mar 27;23(1):136. doi: 10.1186/s12905-023-02266-7. BMC Womens Health. 2023. PMID: 36973776 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous