Simultaneous use of high-volume Foley catheter (60 ml) and misoprostol for labor induction in nulliparous women: A randomized controlled trial
- PMID: 34561872
- DOI: 10.1002/ijgo.13943
Simultaneous use of high-volume Foley catheter (60 ml) and misoprostol for labor induction in nulliparous women: A randomized controlled trial
Abstract
Objective: To examine the simultaneous effect of high-volume Foley catheter (HVFC) (60 ml) and vaginal misoprostol on labor induction in nulliparous women.
Methods: A randomized, double-blind, controlled trial was conducted among nulliparous post-date (>40 weeks) pregnant women between June and December 2019. At enrollment 100 women were randomized into each group (either HVFC and vaginal misoprostol or low-volume Foley catheter [LVFC] [30 ml] and vaginal misoprostol), for labor induction. Demographic and clinical data were collected at enrollment and delivery.
Results: Women in the HVFC group had statistically significantly shorter induction to delivery interval (median 860 min, interquartile range [IQR] 840-940 min vs. 1160 min, IQR 1080-1320 min, P < 0.001) and duration of labor (median 615 min, IQR 600-680 min vs. 750, IQR 692.5-800 min, P < 0.001). Mode of vaginal delivery (n = 94 vs. n = 78, P = 0.002), number of doses of misoprostol required (median 2, IQR 1-2 vs. 2, IQR 1-3), and need of oxytocin augmentation (n = 22 vs. n = 39, P = 0.014 and P < 0.001), was significantly better in the HVFC group. However, there was no significant difference with respect to other maternal or neonatal outcomes.
Conclusion: Simultaneous use of HVFC and vaginal misoprostol for labor induction significantly shortens the induction to delivery interval and duration of labor in nulliparous women.
Trial registration: Clinical Trial Registry of India CTRI/2019/05/019394 (http://ctri.nic.in/Clinicaltrials/pmaindet2.php?trialid=31554&EncHid=&userName=Foley%20catheter).
Keywords: Foley catheter; high volume; labor induction; low volume; mechanical induction of labor.
© 2021 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics.
Similar articles
-
Foley catheter (80 vs 60 mL) and misoprostol for labor induction in nulliparous women: a randomized controlled trial.Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2023 Aug;5(8):101026. doi: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2023.101026. Epub 2023 May 19. Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2023. PMID: 37211088 Clinical Trial.
-
Transcervical Foley Balloon Plus Vaginal Misoprostol versus Vaginal Misoprostol Alone for Cervical Ripening in Nulliparous Obese Women: A Multicenter, Randomized, Comparative-Effectiveness Trial.Am J Perinatol. 2021 Aug;38(S 01):e123-e128. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1708805. Epub 2020 Apr 16. Am J Perinatol. 2021. PMID: 32299108 Clinical Trial.
-
Buccal vs vaginal misoprostol combined with Foley catheter for cervical ripening at term (the BEGIN trial): a randomized controlled trial.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021 May;224(5):524.e1-524.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2021.02.016. Epub 2021 Feb 19. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021. PMID: 33617796 Clinical Trial.
-
Intracervical Foley Catheter Plus Intravaginal Misoprostol vs Intravaginal Misoprostol Alone for Cervical Ripening: A Meta-Analysis.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Mar 11;17(6):1825. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17061825. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020. PMID: 32168947 Free PMC article.
-
Misoprostol combined with cervical single or double balloon catheters versus misoprostol alone for labor induction of singleton pregnancies: a meta-analysis of randomized trials.J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2020 Oct;33(20):3453-3468. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2019.1574741. Epub 2019 Feb 10. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2020. PMID: 30741051
Cited by
-
Influence factor analysis and prediction model of successful application of high-volume Foley Catheter for labor induction.BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023 Nov 9;23(1):776. doi: 10.1186/s12884-023-06101-7. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023. PMID: 37946140 Free PMC article.
-
The 300 versus 300 Study-Low Volume versus High Volume Single Balloon Catheter for Induction of Labor: A Retrospective Case-Control Study.J Clin Med. 2023 Jul 22;12(14):4839. doi: 10.3390/jcm12144839. J Clin Med. 2023. PMID: 37510954 Free PMC article.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Berndl A, El-Chaar D, Murphy K, McDonald S. Does cervical ripening at term using a high volume Foley catheter result in a lower caesarean section rate than a low volume Foley catheter? A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2014;36(8):678-687. doi:10.1016/S1701-2163(15)30509-0
-
- Schoen CN, Saccone G, Backley S, et al. Increased single-balloon Foley catheter volume for induction of labor and time to delivery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2018;97(9):1051-1060. doi:10.1111/aogs.13353
-
- de Vaan MD, ten Eikelder ML, Jozwiak M, et al. Mechanical methods for induction of labour. Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019;2019(10):CD001233. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD001233.pub3
-
- Al-Ibraheemi Z, Brustman L, Bimson BE, Porat N, Rosenn B. Misoprostol with Foley bulb compared with misoprostol alone for cervical ripening. A randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2018;131(1):23-29.
-
- RustOA GM, Atlas RO, Jones KJ, Balducci J. Preinduction cervical ripening. A randomized trial of intravaginal misoprostol alone vs. a combination of transcervical Foley balloon and intravaginal misoprostol. J Reprod Med. 2001;46:899-904.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources