Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Aug 25;8(9):171.
doi: 10.3390/vetsci8090171.

Survey on the Presence of Bacterial and Parasitic Zoonotic Agents in the Feces of Wild Birds

Affiliations

Survey on the Presence of Bacterial and Parasitic Zoonotic Agents in the Feces of Wild Birds

Valentina Virginia Ebani et al. Vet Sci. .

Abstract

Wild avifauna may act as fecal source of bacterial and parasitic pathogens for other birds and mammals. Most of these pathogens have a relevant impact on human and livestock health which may cause severe disease and economic loss. In the present study, the fecal samples collected from 121 wild birds belonging to 15 species of the genera Anas, Tadorna, Fulica, Arddea, Larus, Falco, Athene, Accipiter, and Columba were submitted to bacteriological and molecular analyses to detect Brucella spp., Coxiella burnetii, Mycobacterium spp., Salmonella spp., Cryptosporidium spp., Giardia spp., and microsporidia. Four (3.3%) animals were positive for one pathogen: one Anas penelope for C. burnetii, one Larus michahellis for S. enterica serovar Coeln, and two Columba livia for Encephalitozoon hellem. Although the prevalence rates found in the present survey were quite low, the obtained results confirm that wild birds would be the a potential fecal source of bacterial and parasitic zoonotic pathogens which sometimes can also represent a severe threat for farm animals.

Keywords: Coxiella burnetii; Encephalitozoon; Salmonella; wild avifauna; zoonosis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Johnston W.S., MacLachlan G.K., Hopkins G.F. The possible involvement of seagulls (Larus sp.) in the transmission of Salmonella in dairy cattle. Vet. Rec. 1979;105:526–527. - PubMed
    1. Coulson J.C., Butterfield J., Thomas C. The herring gull Larus argentatus as a likely transmitting agent of Salmonella Montevideo to sheep and cattle. J. Hyg. 1983;91:437–443. doi: 10.1017/S0022172400060472. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fenlon D.R. Wild birds and silage as reservoirs of Listeria in the agricultural environment. J. Appl. Bacteriol. 1985;59:537–543. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.1985.tb03357.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Graczyk T.K., Majewska A.C., Schwab K.J. The role of birds in dissemination of human waterborne enteropathogens. Trends Parasitol. 2008;24:55–59. doi: 10.1016/j.pt.2007.10.007. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Benskin C.M., Wilson K., Jones K., Hartley I.R. Bacterial pathogens in wild birds: A review of the frequency and effects of infection. Biol. Rev. Camb. Philos. Soc. 2009;84:349–373. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-185X.2008.00076.x. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources