The legal challenges to the diagnosis of shaken baby syndrome or how to counter 12 common fake news
- PMID: 34564748
- DOI: 10.1007/s00381-021-05357-8
The legal challenges to the diagnosis of shaken baby syndrome or how to counter 12 common fake news
Abstract
Background: The shaken baby syndrome (SBS) is a common cause of severe traumatic lesions in infants. Although well established for almost five decades, SBS and its diagnosis are becoming more and more aggressively challenged in courts. These challenges feed on the scientific debate and controversies regarding the pathophysiology and the differential diagnoses, scientific uncertainty being readily exploited by specialized barristers.
Material and methods: In the present review, we analyze the most common challenges to the concept of SBS and its diagnosis, as well as the scientific evidence available to counter these challenges, the differential diagnoses, and how SBS can be diagnosed with confidence.
Results: We found that the pathophysiology of SBS is well documented, with stereotyped descriptions by perpetrators, in good correlation with experimental studies and computer models. SBS is a well-defined clinico-pathological entity with a characteristic constellation of lesions; with a rigorous evaluation protocol, its diagnosis can be made rapidly and with excellent accuracy beyond a reasonable doubt.
Conclusion: It is important that medical experts master an extensive knowledge regarding the pathophysiology of the lesions of SBS, in particular infantile subdural hematomas, as well as other CSF-related conditions. This emphasizes the role that pediatric neurosurgeons should play in the clinical and medicolegal management of these patients.
Keywords: Infantile subdural hematoma; Medicolegal inquiry; Retinal hemorrhage.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
Comment in
-
Political rhetoric is no substitute for objective scientific data.Childs Nerv Syst. 2022 Jan;38(1):7-8. doi: 10.1007/s00381-021-05407-1. Epub 2021 Nov 8. Childs Nerv Syst. 2022. PMID: 34750688 No abstract available.
-
Answer to Squier et al.Childs Nerv Syst. 2022 Jan;38(1):9-10. doi: 10.1007/s00381-021-05415-1. Epub 2021 Nov 17. Childs Nerv Syst. 2022. PMID: 34791531
References
-
- Caffey J (1972) On the theory and practice of shaking infants. Its potential residual effects of permanent brain damage and mental retardation. Am J Dis Child 124(2):161–169. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpedi.1972.02110140011001 (PMID: 4559532)
-
- Lynøe N, Elinder G, Hallberg B, Rosén M, Sundgren P, Eriksson A (2017) Insufficient evidence for ‘shaken baby syndrome’ - a systematic review. Acta Paediatr 106(7):1021–1027. https://doi.org/10.1111/apa.13760 (Epub 2017 Mar 1 PMID: 28130787) - DOI - PubMed
-
- Shuman MJ, Hutchins KD (2017) Severe retinal hemorrhages with retinoschisis in infants are not pathognomonic for abusive head trauma. J Forensic Sci 62(3):807–811. https://doi.org/10.1111/1556-4029.13336 (Epub 2016 Dec 16 PMID: 27982430) - DOI - PubMed
-
- Talbert DG (2009) Shaken baby syndrome: does it exist? Med Hypotheses. 72(2):131–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mehy.2008.09.038 {Epub 2008 Nov 13. PMID: 19013026)
-
- Cohen M, Cox P, Kiho L, Pollina E, Scheimberg I (2007) Letter to the editor. Lack of evidence for a causal relationship between hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy and subdural hemorrhage in fetal life, infancy,and early childhood. Pediatr Dev Pathol 10(6):500–501; author reply 502. https://doi.org/10.2350/07-04-0271.1 (PMID: 18001163)
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
