Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022;160(1):35-113.
doi: 10.1007/s11205-021-02740-5. Epub 2021 Sep 19.

The Gender Life Satisfaction/Depression Paradox

Affiliations

The Gender Life Satisfaction/Depression Paradox

Leonardo Becchetti et al. Soc Indic Res. 2022.

Abstract

According to the gender life satisfaction/depression paradox women are significantly more likely to report higher levels of life satisfaction than men after controlling for all relevant socio-demographic factors, but also significantly more likely to declare they are depressed. We find that the paradox holds in the cross-country sample of the European Social Survey and is stable across age, education, self-assessed health, macroregion and survey round splits. We find support for the affect intensity rationale showing that women are relatively more affected in their satisfaction about life by the good or bad events or achievements occurring during their existence and less resilient (less likely to revert to their standard levels of happiness after a shock). We as well discuss biological, genetic, cultural, personality rationales advocated in the literature that can explain our findings.

Keywords: Gender life satisfaction/depression paradox; Subjective wellbeing.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Depression and High Life Satisfaction across different countries. (average values across sample period)
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Gendered marginal effects: age classes. Table 3, Column (1) estimate. Average Marginal effect of age class on depression. The age class between 70 and 79 is the omitted benchmark
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Gendered marginal effects: employment status. Table 3, Column (1) estimate. Average Marginal effect of employment status on depression. The “Paid Work class” is the omitted benchmark
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Gendered marginal effects: education classes. Table 3, Column (1) estimate. Average Marginal effect of education status on depression. The Upper Tertiary class of educational status is the omitted benchmark
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Gendered marginal effects: household income deciles. Table 3, Column (1) estimate. Average Marginal effect of household’s net income on depression. The first (lowest income) class of the household’s net income is the omitted benchmark
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Gendered marginal effects: marital status. Table 3, Column (1) estimate. Average Marginal effect of marital status on depression. The “married” class of marital status is the omitted benchmark
Fig. 7
Fig. 7
Gendered marginal effects: self-assessed health. Table 3, Column (1) estimate. Average Marginal effect of self health on depression. The “Very Good” class of self.-assessed health is the omitted benchmark
Fig. 8
Fig. 8
Gendered marginal effects: frequency of social meetings. Table 3, Column (1) estimate. Average Marginal effect of social meeting on depression. The “Never” class of social meeting is the omitted benchmark
Fig. 9
Fig. 9
Gendered marginal effects: political orientation. Table 3, Column (1) estimate. Average Marginal effect of Placement on the left right scale on depression. The 0 class (extreme left) is the omitted benchmark
Fig. 10
Fig. 10
Gendered marginal effects: income satisfaction. Table 3, Column (1) estimate. Average Marginal effect of feelings about income nowadays on depression. The “Living Comfortably on present income” is the omitted benchmark.

References

    1. Álvarez B, Miles-Touya D. Time allocation and women’s life satisfaction: Evidence from Spain. Social Indicators Research. 2016;129(3):1207–1230. doi: 10.1007/s11205-015-1159-3. - DOI
    1. American Psychological Association. (2014). The road to resilience. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association; Retrieved from http://www.apa.org/helpcenter/road-resilience.aspx.
    1. Archer T, Adrianson L, Plancak A, Karlsson E. Influence of affective personality on cognition-mediated emotional processing: Need for empowerment. The European Journal of Psychiatry. 2007;21(4):248–262. doi: 10.4321/S0213-61632007000400002. - DOI
    1. Balcar J. Soft skills and their wage returns: Overview of empirical literature. Review of Economic Perspectives. 2014;14(1):3–15. doi: 10.2478/revecp-2014-0001. - DOI
    1. Blanchflower David G, Oswald Andrew J. Is well-being U-shaped over the life cycle? Social Science & Medicine. 2008;66(8):1733–1749. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.01.030. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources