Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 May 1;19(3):e108170.
doi: 10.5812/ijem.108170. eCollection 2021 Jul.

Common Limitations and Challenges of Dietary Clinical Trials for Translation into Clinical Practices

Affiliations
Review

Common Limitations and Challenges of Dietary Clinical Trials for Translation into Clinical Practices

Parvin Mirmiran et al. Int J Endocrinol Metab. .

Abstract

The progressive development of clinical and public health nutrition has long relied on dietary clinical trials (DCTs), investigating the causal relationship between diet and multiple risk factors of non-communicable and chronic diseases. DCTs are also hallmarks for establishing dietary requirements and promoting overall nutritional health among the population. Despite their critical importance in translation into public health strategies and practices, DCTs have several limitations and challenges for study design, implementation and finding interpretation. The complex nature of nutrition interventions, collinearity between diet components, multi-target effects of the interventions, diverse dietary behaviors, and food culture are the most challenging issues. Furthermore, baseline exposure and dietary status, appropriate control groups, blinding, randomization, and poor adherence undermine the effectiveness of DCTs in translation into practices. Disruptive factors will be minimized if researchers are committed to following good clinical practice (GCP) standards available for common designs of clinical trials. Planning DCTs, however, needs careful considerations for hypothesis generation, study design development, the definition of primary and secondary outcome measures, and target population.

Keywords: Clinical Trial; Diet; Good Clinical Practice; Nutrition.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interests: The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

    1. Kay CD, Kris-Etherton PM, Psota TL, Bagshaw DM, West SG. Clinical nutrition studies: Maximizing opportunities and managing the challenges. In: Berdanier CD, Dwyer JT, Feldman EB, editors. Handbook of nutrition and food. Florida, United States: CRC Press; 2007. pp. 711–32.
    1. Wahlqvist ML, Hsu-Hage BH, Lukito W. Clinical trials in nutrition. Asia Pac J Clin Nutr. 1999;8(3):231–41. doi: 10.1046/j.1440-6047.1999.00120.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Schmitt JA, Bouzamondo H, Brighenti F, Kies AK, Macdonald I, Pfeiffer AF, et al. The application of good clinical practice in nutrition research. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2012;66(12):1280–1. doi: 10.1038/ejcn.2012.132. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Satija A, Stampfer MJ, Rimm EB, Willett W, Hu FB. Perspective: Are large, simple trials the solution for nutrition research? Adv Nutr. 2018;9(4):378–87. doi: 10.1093/advances/nmy030. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Trepanowski JF, Ioannidis JPA. Perspective: Limiting dependence on nonrandomized studies and improving randomized trials in human nutrition research: Why and how. Adv Nutr. 2018;9(4):367–77. doi: 10.1093/advances/nmy014. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources