Comparison of guidelines on rectal cancer: exception proves the rule?
- PMID: 34567560
- PMCID: PMC8460091
- DOI: 10.1093/gastro/goab034
Comparison of guidelines on rectal cancer: exception proves the rule?
Abstract
The standard of care for early or locally advanced rectal cancer is promoted by multiple clinical practice guidelines globally, but the considerable differences between the guidelines may cause confusion. We compared the latest updated clinical practice guidelines from five professional societies/authorities: National Comprehensive Cancer Network, American Society of Colorectal Surgeons, European Society of Medical Oncology, Chinese National Health Commission, and Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology. Key evidence is discussed for a better understanding of some seemingly contradictory recommendations.
Keywords: clinical practice guideline; comparative study; early or locally advanced; rectal cancer.
© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press and Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University.
References
-
- You YN, Hardiman KM, Bafford A. et al.The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons Clinical Practice Guidelines for the management of rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 2020;63:1191–222. - PubMed
-
- Glynne-Jones R, Wyrwicz L, Tiret E. et al.; ESMO Guidelines Committee. Rectal cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol 2017;28:iv22–40. - PubMed
-
- National Health Commission of the People’s Republic of China. [Chinese protocol of diagnosis and treatment of colorectal cancer (2020 edition)]. Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi 2020;58:561–85 [in Chinese]. - PubMed
-
- Locker GY, Hamilton S, Harris J, ASCO et al.ASCO 2006 Update of recommendations for the use of tumor markers in gastrointestinal cancer. J Clin Oncol 2006;24:5313–27. - PubMed
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
