Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Sep 10:11:664236.
doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.664236. eCollection 2021.

High-Affinity Chimeric Antigen Receptor With Cross-Reactive scFv to Clinically Relevant EGFR Oncogenic Isoforms

Affiliations

High-Affinity Chimeric Antigen Receptor With Cross-Reactive scFv to Clinically Relevant EGFR Oncogenic Isoforms

Radhika Thokala et al. Front Oncol. .

Abstract

Tumor heterogeneity is a key reason for therapeutic failure and tumor recurrence in glioblastoma (GBM). Our chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell (2173 CAR T cells) clinical trial (NCT02209376) against epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) variant III (EGFRvIII) demonstrated successful trafficking of T cells across the blood-brain barrier into GBM active tumor sites. However, CAR T cell infiltration was associated only with a selective loss of EGFRvIII+ tumor, demonstrating little to no effect on EGFRvIII- tumor cells. Post-CAR T-treated tumor specimens showed continued presence of EGFR amplification and oncogenic EGFR extracellular domain (ECD) missense mutations, despite loss of EGFRvIII. To address tumor escape, we generated an EGFR-specific CAR by fusing monoclonal antibody (mAb) 806 to a 4-1BB co-stimulatory domain. The resulting construct was compared to 2173 CAR T cells in GBM, using in vitro and in vivo models. 806 CAR T cells specifically lysed tumor cells and secreted cytokines in response to amplified EGFR, EGFRvIII, and EGFR-ECD mutations in U87MG cells, GBM neurosphere-derived cell lines, and patient-derived GBM organoids. 806 CAR T cells did not lyse fetal brain astrocytes or primary keratinocytes to a significant degree. They also exhibited superior antitumor activity in vivo when compared to 2173 CAR T cells. The broad specificity of 806 CAR T cells to EGFR alterations gives us the potential to target multiple clones within a tumor and reduce opportunities for tumor escape via antigen loss.

Keywords: CAR T cells; EGFR; GBM; adoptive T cell therapy; glioma; immunotherapy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The described work involves patent applications owned by the University of Pennsylvania. MM is an inventor on multiple issued and pending patents related to CAR T cell technology used in this study. These patents are assigned to the University of Pennsylvania and have been licensed to third parties for which royalties have or may be received. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Construction and expression of 806 CAR and EGFR mutant cell lines. (A) Schematic diagram of vector map of 806 CAR containing the 4-1BB co-stimulatory domain. (B) CAR surface expression in primary human CD4+ and CD8+ T cells. Human T cells were simulated for 24 h with anti-CD3/anti-CD28 T-cell activating beads and transduced with CAR transgenes, and CAR expression was analyzed by flow cytometry using biotinylated goat-anti-mouse (806, C225, and CD19 CARs) and goat-anti human F(ab)2 fragment-specific antibodies (2173 CARs) followed by secondary staining with streptavidin-APC. (C) Schematic showing targeted missense mutations in the extracellular domain of EGFR, EGFRR108K/G, EGFRA289D/T/V, EGFRG598V, and splice variant EGFRvIII. (D) Schematic of lentiviral vector co-expressing CFP and wtEGFR or EGFR mutant. (E) Flow-based analysis of endogenous and ectopically expressed EGFR in U87MG, GSC5077, and K562 cell lines using the cetuximab antibody. (F) U87MG, U87MG-EGFR, and GSC5077-EGFR expression of EGFRvIII. (G) U87MG-EGFR, GSC5077-EGFR, and K562 cell lines were transduced with a lentiviral vector co-expressing CFP and indicated EGFR missense mutations and sorted by CFP expression using fluorescent-activated cell sorting.
Figure 2
Figure 2
In vitro characterization of 806 EGFR CAR T cells. Antigen-specific cytolytic activity of 806 and 2173 CAR T cells against cell lines expressing EGFR and its variants. (A) U87MG-EGFR and GSC5077-EGFR cell lines expressing EGFRvIII, EGFRR108K/G, EGFRA289D/T/V, and EGFRG598V mutant variants were stably transduced with Click Beetle Green (CBG) and cocultured with CAR T cells at indicated effector-to-target ratios for 24 h. One representative experiment from three normal donors is shown. Samples were performed in triplicates in three replicative experiments. C225-BB-ζ CAR, and CD19-BB-ζ CAR were used as positive and negative controls, respectively. (B) Antigen-specific cytolytic activity of 806 and 2173 CAR T cells in EGFR and its variants expressed in K562 cells in a 4-h chromium release assay at indicated effector-to-target ratios. (C) K562 cells expressing wtEGFR, EGFRvIII, or EGFR-mutants were cocultured with 806 CART cells for 48 h. IFN-γ, TNF-α, and IL2 secretion was measured in the supernatant by ELISA. Bar charts represent results from a single experiment, and values represent the average ± SD of triplicates. (D) CD107a upregulation on CAR T cells stimulated with K562 cells expressing wtEGFR, EGFRvIII, or EGFR-mutants for 4 h. The percentage of CD107a expression was quantified on CD3 cells (values represent the average of ± SD of two repeated experiments).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Antitumor efficacy of 806 CAR T cells in primary astrocytes and keratinocytes. (A) Surface expression of EGFR assessed by flow cytometry on human primary astrocytes and keratinocytes using EGFR-specific cetuximab antibody. (B) Primary astrocytes and keratinocytes were cocultured with 806 CAR T cells at indicated ratios in a 4-h chromium assay, and results are representative of a single experiment showing the average ± SD of triplicates. (C) Levels of IFN-γ measured in supernatants by ELISA 24 h after coculturing 806 and 2173 CAR T cells with primary astrocytes and keratinocytes at an effector-to-target ratio of 1:1. Results are representative of a single experiment with the average ± SD of triplicates.
Figure 4
Figure 4
In vivo antitumor effect of 806 CAR T cells in NSG mice bearing U87MG-EGFR/EGFRvIII+ xenografts. Seven days after 250,000 U87MG-EGFR/EGFRvIII cells were subcutaneously implanted into mice, 3 × 106 T cells were injected intravenously with indicated CAR constructs. (A) Survival based on time to endpoint was plotted using a Kaplan–Meier curve and statistically significant differences between CAR groups were determined using the log-rank Mantel-Cox test. Tumor burden was assessed by bioluminescent imaging. Bars indicate means ± SD (n = 7 mice per group). Tumor burden was quantified as total flux (B) and in individual mice (C) in units of photons/second. Bars indicate means± SD (n = 7 mice). P = photons. ns, p > 0.05; *p ≤ 0.05; **p ≤ 0.01.
Figure 5
Figure 5
806 CAR T activity in heterogeneous GBOs highlights cross-reactivity of 806 binder against oncogenic EGFRs. CAR T coculture with GBOs was used to demonstrate anti-EGFR activity. (A) EGFR alterations identified in each GBO line. (B) Immunofluorescence images of CAR T cells engrafted GBOs, for four organoids per condition, 9057 (left) and 9066 (right). Blue = DAPI; red = CD3+; white = cleaved caspase 3+ (CC3+), scale bar = 100 µm. (C) Quantification of CD3+ cells (left) and CC3+ cells (right) showing antitumor activity from the 806 CAR T cells. (D) Immunofluorescence images of CAR T cell targets in GBOs, for 9057 (left) and 9066 (right). Blue = DAPI; red = EGFR+; white = EGFRvIII+, scale bar = 100 µm. (E) Quantification of EGFR+ (left) and EGFRvIII+ signals (right) showing antitumor activity from the 806 CAR T cells. Error bars are ± standard error. ns, p > 0.05.

References

    1. Castellarin M, Watanabe K, June CH, Kloss CC, Posey AD., Jr.Driving Cars to the Clinic for Solid Tumors. Gene Ther (2018) 25(3):165–75. doi: 10.1038/s41434-018-0007-x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Fesnak AD, June CH, Levine BL. Engineered T Cells: The Promise and Challenges of Cancer Immunotherapy. Nat Rev Cancer (2016) 16(9):566–81. doi: 10.1038/nrc.2016.97 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Porter DL, Levine BL, Kalos M, Bagg A, June CH. Chimeric Antigen Receptor-Modified T Cells in Chronic Lymphoid Leukemia. N Engl J Med (2011) 365(8):725–33. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1103849 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Jackson C, Ruzevick J, Phallen J, Belcaid Z, Lim M. Challenges in Immunotherapy Presented by the Glioblastoma Multiforme Microenvironment. Clin Dev Immunol (2011) 2011:732413. doi: 10.1155/2011/732413 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Nduom EK, Weller M, Heimberger AB. Immunosuppressive Mechanisms in Glioblastoma. Neuro Oncol (2015) 17(Suppl 7):vii9–vii14. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/nov151 - DOI - PMC - PubMed