Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Sep 8:8:724301.
doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.724301. eCollection 2021.

Off-Label Underdosing or Overdosing of Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulants in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: A Meta-Analysis

Affiliations

Off-Label Underdosing or Overdosing of Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulants in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: A Meta-Analysis

Xiaojuan Wu et al. Front Cardiovasc Med. .

Abstract

Background: Several studies have investigated the role of off-label non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). We aimed to compare the effectiveness and safety outcomes between off-label underdose or overdose vs. on-label dose of NOACs in AF patients. Methods: The PubMed database was systematically searched until August 2021. Observational cohorts were included if they compared the outcomes of off-label underdose or overdose with on-label dose of NOACs in AF patients. The risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were pooled using a fixed-effects model (I 2 ≤ 50%) or a random-effects model (I 2 > 50%). Results: A total of 15 observational studies were included. Compared with on-label dose of NOACs, off-label underdose of NOACs was associated with increased risks of stroke or systemic embolism (RR = 1.09, 95% CI 1.02-1.16), and all-cause death (RR = 1.29, 95% CI 1.10-1.52) but not ischemic stroke (RR = 1.34, 95% CI 0.76-2.36), myocardial infarction (RR = 1.08, 95% CI 0.92-1.28), major bleeding (RR = 0.97, 95% CI 0.89-1.05), intracranial hemorrhage (RR = 1.12, 95% CI 0.90-1.40), and gastrointestinal bleeding (RR = 0.96, 95% CI 0.85-1.07), whereas off-label overdose of NOACs was associated with increased risks of SSE (RR = 1.20, 95% CI 1.05-1.36), all-cause death (RR = 1.22, 95% CI 1.06-1.39), and major bleeding (RR = 1.33, 95% CI 1.16-1.52) but not gastrointestinal bleeding (RR = 1.18, 95% CI 0.99-1.42) and myocardial infarction (RR = 0.98, 95% CI 0.75-1.30). Conclusion: Compared with on-label dose of NOACs, off-label underdose was associated with increased risks of stroke or systemic embolism and all-cause death, whereas off-label overdose of NOACs was associated with increased risks of stroke or systemic embolism, all-cause death, and major bleeding.

Keywords: anticoagulants; atrial fibrillation; meta-analysis; off label; outcomes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flowchart of electronic retrievals of this meta-analysis.
Figure 2
Figure 2
A fixed-effects model for comparing the outcomes between off-label underdose and on-label dose of NOACs in patients with atrial fibrillation. NOACs, non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants; SSE, stroke or systemic embolism; IS, ischemic stroke; MI, myocardial infarction; ICH, intracranial hemorrhage; GI, gastrointestinal; CI, confidence interval; SE, standard error; IV, inverse of the variance.
Figure 3
Figure 3
A random-effects model for comparing the outcomes between off-label underdose and on-label dose of NOACs in patients with atrial fibrillation. NOACs, non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants; IS, ischemic stroke; CI, confidence interval; SE, standard error; IV, inverse of the variance.
Figure 4
Figure 4
A fixed-effects model for comparing the ischemic stroke between off-label overdose and on-label dose of NOACs in patients with atrial fibrillation NOACs, non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants; SSE, stroke or systemic embolism; MI, myocardial infarction; CI, confidence interval; SE, standard error; IV, inverse of the variance.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. January CT, Wann LS, Calkins H, Chen LY, Cigarroa JE, Cleveland JC, et al. . 2019 AHA/ACC/HRS Focused Update of the 2014 AHA/ACC/HRS guideline for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on clinical practice guidelines and the heart rhythm society in collaboration with the society of thoracic surgeons. Circulation. (2019). 140:R665. 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000665 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Zhu W, Ye Z, Chen S, Wu D, He J, Dong Y, et al. . Comparative effectiveness and safety of non–vitamin k antagonist oral anticoagulants in atrial fibrillation patients. Stroke. (2021) 52:1225–33. 10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.031007 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Zhou Y, Ma J, Zhu W. Efficacy and safety of direct oral anticoagulants versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation across bmi categories: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Cardiovasc Drug. (2020) 20:51–60. 10.1007/s40256-019-00362-4 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chen C, Cao Y, Zheng Y, Dong Y, Ma J, Zhu W, et al. . Effect of rivaroxaban or apixaban in atrial fibrillation patients with stage 4–5 chronic kidney disease or on dialysis. Cardiovasc Drug Ther. (2021) 35:273–81. 10.1007/s10557-021-07144-8 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kirchhof P, Benussi S, Kotecha D, Ahlsson A, Atar D, Casadei B, et al. . (2016). ESC Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with EACTS. Eur Heart J. (2016) 37:2893–962. 10.5603/KP.2016.0172 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources