Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Dec;25(12):6517-6531.
doi: 10.1007/s00784-021-04157-3. Epub 2021 Sep 27.

Intraoral scanning reduces procedure time and improves patient comfort in fixed prosthodontics and implant dentistry: a systematic review

Rafael Siqueira  1 , Matthew Galli  1 , Zhaozhao Chen  1 , Gustavo Mendonça  2 , Luiz Meirelles  3 , Hom-Lay Wang  1 , Hsun-Liang Chan  4
Affiliations

Intraoral scanning reduces procedure time and improves patient comfort in fixed prosthodontics and implant dentistry: a systematic review

Rafael Siqueira et al. Clin Oral Investig. 2021 Dec.

Abstract

Objectives: The primary aim of this systematic review was to evaluate whether intraoral scanning (IOS) is able to reduce working time and improve patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) compared to conventional impression (CI) techniques, taking into account the size of the scanned area. The secondary aim was to verify the effectiveness of IOS procedures based on available prosthodontic outcomes.

Materials and methods: Electronic and manual literature searches were performed to collect evidence concerning the outcomes of IOS and CI performed during the treatment of partially and complete edentulous patients for tooth- or implant-supported restorations. Qualitative analysis was conducted to evaluate the time efficiency and PROMs produced by the two different techniques. Clinical prosthodontic outcomes were analyzed among the included studies when available.

Results: Seventeen studies (9 randomized controlled trials and 8 prospective clinical studies) were selected for qualitative synthesis. The 17 included studies provided data from 430 IOS and 370 CI performed in 437 patients. A total of 7 different IOS systems and their various updated versions were used for digital impressions. The results demonstrated that IOS was overall faster than CI independent of whether quadrant or complete-arch scanning was utilized, regardless of the nature of the restoration (tooth or implant supported). IOS was generally preferred over CI regardless of the size of the scanned area and nature of the restoration (tooth- or implant-supported). Similar prosthodontic outcomes were reported for workflows implementing CI and IOS.

Conclusions: Within the limitations of this systematic review, IOS is faster than CI, independent of whether a quadrant or complete arch scan is conducted. IOS can improve the patient experience measured by overall preference and comfort and is able to provide reliable prosthodontic outcomes.

Clinical relevance: Reduced procedure working time associated with the use of IOS can improve clinical efficiency and the patient experience during impression procedures. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are an essential component of evidence-based dental practice as they allow the evaluation of therapeutic modalities from the perspective of the patient. IOS is generally preferred by patients over conventional impressions.

Keywords: Conventional workflow; Digital impression; Digital workflow; Intraoral scanner; Quality of outcomes; Time efficiency.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
PRISMA flowchart
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Time efficiency of impression procedures reported in included studies
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Pant R, Juszczyk AS, Clark RK, Radford DR. Long-term dimensional stability and reproduction of surface detail of four polyvinyl siloxane duplicating materials. J Dent. 2008;36:456–461. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2008.03.003. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Donovan TE, Chee WW. A review of contemporary impression materials and techniques. Dent Clin North Am. 2004;48:vi-vii 445–70. doi: 10.1016/j.cden.2003.12.014. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chee WW, Donovan TE. Polyvinyl siloxane impression materials: a review of properties and techniques. J Prosthet Dent. 1992;68:728–732. doi: 10.1016/0022-3913(92)90192-d. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Tsirogiannis P, Neophytou S, Reul A, Heydecke G, Reissmann DR (2017) Can we measure patients’ perception during dental impressions? The Burdens in Dental Impression-Making Questionnaire - BiDIM-Q. J Prosthodont Res 61:34–42. 10.1016/j.jpor.2016.03.003 - PubMed
    1. Hacker T, Heydecke G, Reissmann DR (2015) Impact of procedures during prosthodontic treatment on patients’ perceived burdens. J Dent 43:51–57. 10.1016/j.jdent.2014.10.013 - PubMed

Publication types

Substances

LinkOut - more resources