Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Sep 10;13(18):4546.
doi: 10.3390/cancers13184546.

Harnessing the Immune System to Fight Multiple Myeloma

Affiliations
Review

Harnessing the Immune System to Fight Multiple Myeloma

Jakub Krejcik et al. Cancers (Basel). .

Abstract

Multiple myeloma (MM) is a heterogeneous plasma cell malignancy differing substantially in clinical behavior, prognosis, and response to treatment. With the advent of novel therapies, many patients achieve long-lasting remissions, but some experience aggressive and treatment refractory relapses. So far, MM is considered incurable. Myeloma pathogenesis can broadly be explained by two interacting mechanisms, intraclonal evolution of cancer cells and development of an immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment. Failures in isotype class switching and somatic hypermutations result in the neoplastic transformation typical of MM and other B cell malignancies. Interestingly, although genetic alterations occur and evolve over time, they are also present in premalignant stages, which never progress to MM, suggesting that genetic mutations are necessary but not sufficient for myeloma transformation. Changes in composition and function of the immune cells are associated with loss of effective immune surveillance, which might represent another mechanism driving malignant transformation. During the last decade, the traditional view on myeloma treatment has changed dramatically. It is increasingly evident that treatment strategies solely based on targeting intrinsic properties of myeloma cells are insufficient. Lately, approaches that redirect the cells of the otherwise suppressed immune system to take control over myeloma have emerged. Evidence of utility of this principle was initially established by the observation of the graft-versus-myeloma effect in allogeneic stem cell-transplanted patients. A variety of new strategies to harness both innate and antigen-specific immunity against MM have recently been developed and intensively tested in clinical trials. This review aims to give readers a basic understanding of how the immune system can be engaged to treat MM, to summarize the main immunotherapeutic modalities, their current role in clinical care, and future prospects.

Keywords: adoptive cell transfer; allogeneic stem cell transplantation; cancer vaccination; immune modulation; immunogenic cell death; immunomodulatory drugs; immunotherapy; monoclonal antibodies; multiple myeloma.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Overview of immunotherapeutic principles in Multiple Myeloma. ASCT: Autologous stem cell transplantation; DLI: Donor lymphocyte infusion; ICD: Immunologic cell death; IMIDs: Immunomodulatory drugs; mAbs: Monoclonal antibodies; MILs: Marrow infiltrating lymphocytes; PIs: Proteasome inhibitors.
Figure 2
Figure 2
T-cell and NK-cell-dependent therapies without genetic manipulation (allogeneic stem cell transplantation, vaccination strategies, adoptive immune transfer of lymphocytes without genetic manipulation). Allo-SCT: Allogeneic stem cell transplantation; GvM: Graft versus myeloma; IMIDs: immunomodulatory drugs; MILs: Marrow-infiltrating lymphocytes; MDSCs: Myeloid-derived suppressor cells; TAMs: Tumor-associated macrophages; Tregs: Regulatory T cells; mHag: Minor histocompatibility antigen.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Adoptive immune transfer of autologous and allogeneic lymphocytes with genetic manipulation (TCR-engineered T cells, chimeric antigen receptor T-cells, and chimeric antigen receptor NK-cells).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Strategies mitigating immune resistance—reviving of existing immune responses and stimulating innate immune system. ICD: Immunologic cell death; IMIDs: Immunomodulatory drugs; MILs: Marrow infiltrating lymphocytes; MDSCs: Myeloid-derived suppressor cells; TAMs: Tumor-associated macrophages, Tregs: Regulatory T cells.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. De Mel S., Lim S.H., Tung M.L., Chng W.-J. Implications of Heterogeneity in Multiple Myeloma. BioMed Res. Int. 2014;2014:232546. doi: 10.1155/2014/232546. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Landgren O., Kyle R.A., Rajkumar S.V. From Myeloma Precursor Disease to Multiple Myeloma: New Diagnostic Concepts and Opportunities for Early Intervention. Clin. Cancer Res. 2011;17:1243–1252. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-10-1822. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dhodapkar M.V. MGUS to Myeloma: A Mysterious Gammopathy of Underexplored Significance. Blood. 2016;128:2599–2606. doi: 10.1182/blood-2016-09-692954. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mikulasova A., Wardell C.P., Murison A., Boyle E.M., Jackson G.H., Smetana J., Kufova Z., Pour L., Sandecka V., Almasi M., et al. The Spectrum of Somatic Mutations in Monoclonal Gammopathy of Undetermined Significance Indicates a Less Complex Genomic Landscape than That in Multiple Myeloma. Haematologica. 2017;102:1617–1625. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2017.163766. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Morgan G.J., Walker B.A., Davies F.E. The Genetic Architecture of Multiple Myeloma. Nat. Rev. Cancer. 2012;12:335–348. doi: 10.1038/nrc3257. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources