Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Sep 10;13(18):4555.
doi: 10.3390/cancers13184555.

Novel Insights into the Antagonistic Effects of Losartan against Angiotensin II/AGTR1 Signaling in Glioblastoma Cells

Affiliations

Novel Insights into the Antagonistic Effects of Losartan against Angiotensin II/AGTR1 Signaling in Glioblastoma Cells

Salvatore Panza et al. Cancers (Basel). .

Abstract

New avenues for glioblastoma therapy are required due to the limited mortality benefit of the current treatments. The renin-angiotensin system (RAS) exhibits local actions and works as a paracrine system in different tissues and tumors, including glioma. The glioblastoma cell lines U-87 MG and T98G overexpresses Angiotensin II (Ang II)/Angiotensin II type I receptor (AGTR1) signaling, which enhances in vitro and in vivo local estrogen production through a direct up-regulation of the aromatase gene promoters p I.f and p I.4. In addition, Ang II/AGTR1 signaling transactivates estrogen receptor-α in a ligand-independent manner through mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) activation. The higher aromatase mRNA expression in patients with glioblastoma was associated with the worst survival prognostic, according to The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). An intrinsic immunosuppressive glioblastoma tumor milieu has been previously documented. We demonstrate how Ang II treatment in glioblastoma cells increases programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression reversed by combined exposure to Losartan (LOS) in vitro and in vivo. Our findings highlight how LOS, in addition, antagonizes the previously documented neoangiogenetic, profibrotic, and immunosuppressive effects of Ang II and drastically inhibits its stimulatory effects on local estrogen production, sustaining glioblastoma cell growth. Thus, Losartan may represent an adjuvant pharmacological tool to be repurposed prospectively for glioblastoma treatment.

Keywords: Angiotensin II; Angiotensin II type I receptor; Losartan; aromatase; estrogen; glioblastoma; renin-angiotensin system.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
AGTR1 expression in SVG p12 normal glial cells and U-87 MG and T98G glioblastoma cells. (A) Real-time RT-PCR for AGTR1 in SVG p12, U-87 MG, and T98G cells; mRNA is shown relative to SVG p12 normal glial cells. (B) Immunoblotting showing AGTR1 protein expression. β-actin was used as a loading control. The histograms represent the mean average ± SD of three separate experiments in which band intensities were evaluated in terms of optical density arbitrary unit and expressed as fold change over SVG12 for U-87 MG and T98G. (C) Immunofluorescence of AGTR1 in SVG p12, U-87 MG, and T98G cells. DAPI staining for nuclear detection. Scale bars = 5 µm. Original magnification, ×100. Data are expressed as means ± SD of three different experiments, each performed in triplicate. ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001.
Figure 2
Figure 2
AGTR1 and clinical outcomes in GBM patients. Kaplan–Meier survival analysis relating AGTR1 levels and overall survival (OS) (A), progression-free survival (PFS) (B), OS in chemotherapy-treated (C) GBM patients (TCGA dataset).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Effects of Ang II receptor antagonist Losartan on Ang II-induced AGTR1 expression in U-87 MG and T98G glioblastoma cells. (A,B) Real-time RT-PCR and immunoblotting assay for AGTR1 mRNA and protein expression in U-87 MG and T98G cells treated with vehicle (−) or the Ang II 0.1, 5, and 10 µM for 24 h. β-actin was used as a loading control. The histograms represent the mean average ± SD of three separate experiments in which band intensities were evaluated in terms of optical density arbitrary unit and expressed as fold change over vehicle (−) for Ang II treatment. (C,D) AGTR1 mRNA and protein expression in U-87 MG and T98G cells treated with vehicle (−) and Ang II 5 µM alone or in combination with LOS 5 µM for 24 h. The histograms represent the mean average ± SD of three separate experiments in which band intensities were evaluated in terms of optical density arbitrary unit and expressed as fold change over vehicle (−) for Ang II treatment or fold over Ang II for Ang II in combination with LOS. β-actin was used as a loading control. Data represent the mean ± SD of three different experiments, each performed in triplicate. ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Effects of LOS on Ang II-induced U-87 MG and T98G glioblastoma cell proliferation, migration, and invasiveness. Cell proliferation was determined by the [3H]thymidine (A,C) and soft agar growth (B,D) assays in U-87 MG and T98G glioblastoma cells treated with vehicle (−) and Ang II 5 µM alone or in combination with LOS 5 µM for 24 h. (E,F) Wound-healing assays in U-87 MG and T98G glioblastoma cells treated for 12 h with vehicle (−) and Ang II 5 µM alone or in combination with LOS 5 µM. Images are representative of three independent experiments. The percentage of wound closure has been represented on histograms calculated using ImageJ software version 1.51q. Squares, time 0. Original magnification, ×10. Boyden chamber transmigration (G,I) and invasion (H,J) assays in U-87 MG and T98G glioblastoma cells treated with vehicle (−) and Ang II 5 µM alone or in combination with the LOS 5 µM for 12 h. Data represent the mean ± SD of three different experiments, each performed in triplicate. ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Aromatase expression in SVG p12 normal glial cells and U-87 MG and T98G glioblastoma cells. (A) Real-time RT-PCR for CYP19A1 in SVG p12 normal glial cells, U-87 MG, and T98G glioblastoma cells; mRNA is shown relative to SVG p12 normal glial cells. (B) Immunoblotting showing Arom protein expression. β-actin was used as a control for equal loading and transfer. The histograms represent the mean average ± SD of three separate experiments in which band intensities were evaluated in terms of optical density arbitrary unit and expressed as fold change over SVG p12 for U-87 MG and T98G. (C) Immunofluorescence of Arom in SVG p12 normal glial cells, U-87 MG, and T98G glioblastoma cells. DAPI staining for nuclear detection. Scale bars = 5 µm. Original magnification, ×100. Data are expressed as means ± SD of three different experiments, each performed in triplicate. *** p < 0.001.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Aromatase and clinical outcomes in GBM patients. Kaplan–Meier survival analysis relating CYP19A1 levels and overall survival (OS) in GBM patients (TCGA dataset).
Figure 7
Figure 7
Effects of Ang II and LOS on aromatase expression and activity in U-87 MG and T98G glioblastoma cells. (A,B) Real-time RT-PCR and immunoblotting assay for CYP19A1 mRNA and protein expression in U-87 MG and T98G glioblastoma cells, treated with vehicle (−) or the Ang II 0.1, 5, and 10 µM for 24 h. GAPDH was used as a loading control. The histograms represent the mean average ± SD of three separate experiments in which band intensities were evaluated in terms of optical density arbitrary unit and expressed as fold change over vehicle (−) for Ang II treatment. (C,D) CYP19A1 mRNA and protein expression in U-87 MG and T98G glioblastoma cells treated with vehicle (−) and Ang II 5 µM alone or in combination with LOS 5 µM for 24 h. The histograms represent the mean average ± SD of three separate experiments in which band intensities were evaluated in terms of optical density arbitrary unit and expressed as fold change over vehicle (−) for Ang II treatment or fold change over Ang II for Ang II in combination with LOS, 5 µM. GAPDH was used as a loading control. (E,G) Aromatase activity in U-87 MG and T98G glioblastoma cells treated with vehicle (−) and Ang II 5 µM alone or in combination with LOS 5 µM for 24 h. (F,H) ELISA for Estradiol secretion in U-87 MG and T98G glioblastoma cells treated with vehicle (−) and Ang II 5 µM alone or in combination with LOS 5 µM for 24 h. Data represent the mean ± SD of three different experiments, each performed in triplicate. ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001.
Figure 8
Figure 8
Ang II potentiates the estradiol levels produced by an aromatizable steroid androst-4-ene-3,17-dione in U-87 MG glioblastoma cells. (A) ELISA for Estradiol secretion treated with vehicle (−), Ang II 5 µM, androst-4-ene-3,17-dione (AD 10 nM), Ang II 5 µM plus AD 10 nM, and Ang II 5 µM plus AD 10 nM plus LOS 5 µM for 24 h. (B) Cell proliferation was determined by the [3H]thymidine assay in U-87 MG cells treated with vehicle (−), estradiol (E2 10 nM), Ang II 5 µM, AD 10 nM, Ang II 5 µM plus AD 10 nM, and Ang II 5 µM plus AD 10 nM plus LOS 5 µM for 24 h. Data are expressed as means ± SD of three different experiments, each performed in triplicate. * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001.
Figure 9
Figure 9
Aromatase promoters pI.f/I.4 in U-87 MG glioblastoma cells are stimulated upon Ang II exposure. (A,B) Upper panel, schematic map of the pI.f and pI.4 aromatase constructs. U-87 MG glioblastoma cells were transiently transfected with the reported constructs and treated with vehicle (−) or Ang II 5 µM, alone or in combination with LOS 5 µM for 24 h. (C,D) U-87 MG glioblastoma cells were treated in the presence of vehicle (−) or Ang II 5 µM for 3 h. Nuclear extracts were incubated with a biotinylated oligonucleotide containing the AP-1 or AP-1 mutant site in the aromatase promoters pI.f (left panel) or with a biotinylated oligonucleotide containing the STAT3 or STAT3 mutant site in the aromatase promoters pI.4 (right panel) and subjected to DNA affinity precipitation assay. Specifically bound proteins were subjected to Western blotting analysis. The specificity of the binding was tested by loading the unbound fraction (Negative Control). U-87 MG glioblastoma cells nuclear extracts were used as positive control. The histograms represent the mean average ± SD of three separate experiments in which band intensities were evaluated in terms of optical density arbitrary unit and expressed as fold change over vehicle (−) for Ang II treatment. (E,F) U-87 MG glioblastoma cells were treated in the presence of vehicle (−) or Ang II 5 µM for 3 h, then cross-linked with formaldehyde and lysed. The precleared chromatin was immunoprecipitated with anti-c-Jun or anti-RNA Pol II (left panel) or with anti-STAT3 and anti-RNA Pol II (the right panel). The 5′flanking sequence of the CYP19A1 gene was detected by real-time PCR with specific primers to amplify aromatase promoter sequence, including the AP-1 and STAT3 sites. Input DNA was amplified as loading controls. Data are expressed as means ± SD of three different experiments, each performed in triplicate. * p < 0.05; *** p < 0.001.
Figure 10
Figure 10
LOS Inhibits Ang II-induced tumor growth of U-87 MG xenografts. (A) U-87 MG glioblastoma cells were injected subcutaneously in female nude mice (five mice per group) and then treated with vehicle (−), Ang II alone, or in combination with LOS or ANA. Relative tumor volume (RTV) was calculated by the following formula: RTV = (Vx/V1) where Vx is the tumor volume on day x and V1 is the tumor volume at initiation of treatment (day 0). y-axis: means ± SD of the RTV. (B) Images of representative individual tumors and average tumor weight from vehicle (−), Ang II alone, or in combination with LOS or ANA. (C) Hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining of tumor sections from vehicle (−), LOS and Ang II alone, or in combination with LOS or ANA. (D) Immunohistochemical analysis in U-87 MG xenograft tumor of Ki-67, Arom, upon Ang II treatment w/o LOS or w/o ANA and both LOS and ANA. Scale bars = 12.5 μm. * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Thakkar J.P., Dolecek T.A., Horbinski C., Ostrom Q.T., Lightner D.D., Barnholtz-Sloan J.S., Villano J.L. Epidemiologic and molecular prognostic review of glioblastoma. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev. 2014;23:1985–1996. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-14-0275. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ostrom Q.T., Cote D.J., Ascha M., Kruchko C., Barnholtz-Sloan J.S. Adult glioma incidence and survival by race or ethnicity in the United States From 2000 to 2014. JAMA Oncol. 2018;4:1254–1262. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.1789. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wilson T.A., Karajannis M.A., Harter D.H. Glioblastoma multiforme: State of the art and future therapeutics. Surg. Neurol. Int. 2014;5:64. doi: 10.4103/2152-7806.132138. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lyne S.B., Yamini B. An alternative pipeline for glioblastoma therapeutics: A systematic review of drug repurposing 763 in glioblastoma. Cancers (Basel) 2021;13:1953. doi: 10.3390/cancers13081953. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hanahan D., Weinberg R.A. Hallmarks of cancer: The next generation. Cell. 2011;144:646–674. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2011.02.013. - DOI - PubMed