Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Sep 13;13(18):4599.
doi: 10.3390/cancers13184599.

Inflammatory Biomarker Score Identifies Patients with Six-Fold Increased Risk of One-Year Mortality after Pancreatic Cancer

Affiliations

Inflammatory Biomarker Score Identifies Patients with Six-Fold Increased Risk of One-Year Mortality after Pancreatic Cancer

Alisa D Kjaergaard et al. Cancers (Basel). .

Abstract

We examined whether elevated plasma C-reactive protein (CRP), carbohydrate antigen (CA) 19-9, interleukin-6 (IL-6) and YKL-40, individually or combined, can identify poor survivors among patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). We measured CRP, CA 19-9, IL-6 and YKL-40 in 993 patients at the time of PDAC diagnosis. The biomarker score was the sum of biomarker categories, coded 0, 1 and 2 for low, intermediate and high plasma concentrations, respectively. High vs. low levels of CRP, CA 19-9 and IL-6 were each independently associated with a two-fold increased risk of one-year mortality. CRP performed best in patients with advanced and CA 19-9 in patients with low cancer stages. YKL-40 was not associated with mortality and, therefore, was not included in the biomarker score. Compared to the biomarker score = 0, the multifactorially adjusted hazard ratios for one-year mortality were 1.56 (95% confidence interval: 0.99-2.44) for score = 1, 2.22 (1.41-3.49) for score = 2, 3.44 (2.20-5.38) for score = 3, 5.13 (3.21-8.17) for score = 4 and 6.32 (3.84-10.41) for score = 5-6 (p-value for trend = 3 × 10-31). This score performed better than any single biomarker or combination of biomarkers when examined in similarly sized or other categories. In conclusion, a combination score of elevated CRP, CA 19-9 and IL-6 identified patients with six-fold higher one-year mortality.

Keywords: C-reactive protein; CA-19-9 antigen; carcinoma; chitinase-3-like protein 1; interleukin-6; pancreatic ductal.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Kaplan–Meier survival curves for plasma CRP, CA 19-9, IL-6 and YKL-40 categories. p-value for trend is from Wald test of trend across groups.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Risk of one-year mortality after diagnosis of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma according to biomarker categories. Model 1 was adjusted for age and sex and included all participants. Models 2 and 3 were additionally adjusted for performance status (0–1 and 2–4), operation (yes/no), cancer stage (I–II and III–IV) and all the biomarkers (except if considered exposure). Model 2 included patients with complete information and Model 3 all patients due to multiple imputation.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curves for one-year mortality for CRP, CA 19-9, IL-6 and YKL-40, stratified by performance status (PS), operation (yes/no) and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma stage.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Kaplan–Meier survival curve for plasma CRP, CA 19-9 and IL-6 categories combined into a biomarker score3. Biomarker score3 was calculated as the sum of CRP, CA 19-9 and IL-6 categories coded as 0, 1 and 2 for low, intermediate and high plasma levels, respectively. p-value for trend is from Wald test of trend across groups.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Risk of one-year mortality after pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma according to biomarker score3. Biomarker score3 was calculated as the sum of CRP, CA 19-9 and IL-6 categories coded as 0, 1 and 2 for low, intermediate and high plasma levels, respectively. p-values for trend are from Wald tests across groups treating biomarker levels as continuous variables in the Cox regression model.

References

    1. Bray F., Ferlay J., Soerjomataram I., Siegel R.L., Torre L.A., Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2018;68:394–424. doi: 10.3322/caac.21492. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rahib L., Smith B.D., Aizenberg R., Rosenzweig A.B., Fleshman J.M., Matrisian L.M. Projecting cancer incidence and deaths to 2030: The unexpected burden of thyroid, liver, and pancreas cancers in the United States. Cancer Res. 2014;74:2913–2921. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-14-0155. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gordon-Dseagu V.L., Devesa S.S., Goggins M., Stolzenberg-Solomon R. Pancreatic cancer incidence trends: Evidence from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) population-based data. Int. J. Epidemiol. 2018;47:427–439. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyx232. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kleeff J., Korc M., Apte M., La Vecchia C., Johnson C.D., Biankin A.V., Neale R.E., Tempero M., Tuveson D.A., Hruban R.H., et al. Pancreatic cancer. Nat. Rev. Dis. Primers. 2016;2:16022. doi: 10.1038/nrdp.2016.22. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Crawford H.C., Pasca di Magliano M., Banerjee S. Signaling Networks That Control Cellular Plasticity in Pancreatic Tumorigenesis, Progression, and Metastasis. Gastroenterology. 2019;156:2073–2084. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2018.12.042. - DOI - PMC - PubMed