The Use of Draught Animals in Rural Labour
- PMID: 34573649
- PMCID: PMC8471664
- DOI: 10.3390/ani11092683
The Use of Draught Animals in Rural Labour
Abstract
This study discusses scientific findings on the use of draught animals such as equids (i.e., horses, mules, and donkeys) and bovids (i.e., cattle and water buffaloes) in rural labours. Relevant peer-reviewed literature published between 1980 and 2021 was retrieved from CAB Abstracts, PubMed, ISI Web of Knowledge, and Scopus databases. Although animals were used to produce draught power since their domestication and are still being used for this purpose, mechanisation has markedly reduced animal labour demand in agriculture. However, the process was uneven across continents according to economic constraints, and draught animals are currently concentrated in small production units located on terrains that do not favour agriculture mechanisation in Africa, Latin America, and Asia. Generally, equids can work at rates similar to those of bovids or faster but can sustain the work for shorter periods of time. In addition, buffaloes possess tough hooves and resistance to disease that make them suitable for working in wetlands and clay soils. Draught animals allow a marked reduction of both GHG emissions and non-renewable energy consumption as compared with agricultural machinery. In addition, they may allow obtaining profits from otherwise non-usable lands. Therefore, their use should be promoted in rural areas where low investments are usually the only ones feasible, and the energy of the animals can be obtained at a low cost by feeding them harvest residues and by-products. However, more attention should be paid to the quality of human-animal interactions-due to the close contact between animals and humans while working-and to the welfare of draught animals when transported and slaughtered-due to the high prevalence of injuries they suffer when subjected to these practices.
Keywords: animal welfare; bovids; buffaloes; cattle; donkeys; draught animals; equids; greenhouse gas emission; horses; rural activities.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
-
- Mota-Rojas D., Velarde A., Maris-Huertas S., Cajiao M.N., editors. Animal Welfare, A Global Vision in Ibero-America. 3rd ed. Elsevier; Barcelona, Spain: 2016. pp. 1–516. (In Spanish)
-
- Mota-Rojas D., Álvarez A., Bertoni A., Molina S., José N., López G., Mora P., Guerrero I., Napolitano F. Chapter 8. The role of animals in agricultural sustainability (In Spanish) In: Guerrero-Legarreta I., Napolitano F., Mota-Rojas D., Orihuela A., editors. The River Buffalo in the Americas. 2nd ed. BM Editors Press; Mexico City, Mexico: 2019. pp. 264–296.
-
- Hu S., Hu Y., Yang J., Yang M., Wei P., Hou Y., Marshall F.B. From Pack Animals to Polo: Donkeys from the Ninth-Century Tang Tomb of an Elite Lady in Xi’an, China. Antiquity. 2020;94:455–472. doi: 10.15184/aqy.2020.6. - DOI
-
- Mingala C.N., Villanueva M., Cruz L. River and Swamp Buffaloes: History, Distribution and their Characteristics. In: Presicce G.A., editor. The buffalo (Bubalus Bubalis) Production and Research. Bentham Science Publishers; Rome, Italy: 2017. pp. 3–31.
-
- Mota-Rojas D., Álvarez-Macías A., Napolitano F., Cruz-Monterrosa R., Bertoni A., Molina S., Mora-Medina P., Daniel Ghezzi M., Ramírez-Bribiesca E. Chapter 9. Working animals: Anonymous actors in rural areas (In Spanish) In: Napolitano F., Mota-Rojas D., Guerrero-Legarreta I., Orihuela A., editors. The River Buffalo in the Americas. 3rd ed. BM Editors Press; Mexico City, Mexico: 2020. pp. 1–1300.
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources