Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Sep 9;18(18):9517.
doi: 10.3390/ijerph18189517.

Walking Ability Outcome Measures in Individuals with Spinal Cord Injury: A Systematic Review

Affiliations

Walking Ability Outcome Measures in Individuals with Spinal Cord Injury: A Systematic Review

Isabel Sinovas-Alonso et al. Int J Environ Res Public Health. .

Abstract

Walking function recovery in spinal cord injury (SCI) is tackled through several therapeutic approaches in which precise evaluation is essential. A systematic review was performed to provide an updated qualitative review of walking ability outcome measures in SCI and to analyze their psychometric properties. PubMed, Cochrane, and PEDro databases were consulted until 1 April 2020. Seventeen articles written in English were included. Five of them studied the walking index for SCI, four studied the 10 meter walk test, and two studied the six-minute walk test, the timed Up and go test, and the Berg balance scale. The rest of the articles studied the following metrics: gait profile score, spinal cord injury functional ambulation profile, five times sit-to-stand test, spinal cord injury functional ambulation inventory, spinal cord independence measure (indoors and outdoors mobility items), locomotor stages in spinal cord injury, community balance and mobility scale, and activity-based balance level evaluation scale. The choice of a single or a set of metrics should be determined by the clinician. Based on the results obtained in this review, a combination of outcome measures is proposed to assess walking ability. Future work is required to integrate a more realistic environment for walking assessment.

Keywords: outcome measures; psychometric properties; spinal cord injury; walking ability.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow diagram of the search strategy results.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Singh A., Tetreault L., Kalsi-Ryan S., Nouri A., Fehlings M.G. Global Prevalence and Incidence of Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury. Clin. Epidemiol. 2014;6:309–331. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S68889. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kirshblum S.C., Burns S.P., Biering-Sorensen F., Donovan W., Graves D.E., Jha A., Johansen M., Jones L., Krassioukov A., Mulcahey M., et al. International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury (Revised 2011) J. Spinal Cord Med. 2011;34:535–546. doi: 10.1179/204577211X13207446293695. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Anderson K.D. Targeting Recovery: Priorities of the Spinal Cord-Injured Population. J. Neurotrauma. 2004;21:1371–1383. doi: 10.1089/neu.2004.21.1371. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chan K., Guy K., Shah G., Golla J., Flett H.M., Williams J., Musselman K.E. Retrospective Assessment of the Validity and Use of the Community Balance and Mobility Scale among Individuals with Subacute Spinal Cord Injury. Spinal Cord. 2017;55:294–299. doi: 10.1038/sc.2016.140. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Barbeau H., Nadeau S., Garneau C. Physical Determinants, Emerging Concepts, and Training Approaches in Gait of Individuals with Spinal Cord Injury. J. Neurotrauma. 2006;23:571–585. doi: 10.1089/neu.2006.23.571. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types