Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Sep 16;18(18):9746.
doi: 10.3390/ijerph18189746.

Postcoital Vaginal Perforation and Evisceration in Women with No Prior Pelvic Surgery: Laparoscopic Management and Systematic Review of the Literature

Guglielmo Stabile  1 , Denise Mordeglia  2 , Federico Romano  1 , Stefania Carlucci  3 , Francesco Paolo Mangino  1 , Luigi Nappi  4 , Felice Sorrentino  4 , Nicolò De Manzini  2 , Giuseppe Ricci  1   2
Affiliations

Postcoital Vaginal Perforation and Evisceration in Women with No Prior Pelvic Surgery: Laparoscopic Management and Systematic Review of the Literature

Guglielmo Stabile et al. Int J Environ Res Public Health. .

Abstract

Objective: to evaluate risk factors, causes, management and surgical therapy of postcoital vaginal perforation and evisceration in women with no prior pelvic surgery.

Data sources: We used MEDLINE (PubMed), Scopus, Embase and Web of Science for our research. Our review includes all reports from 1980 to November 2020. The research strategy adopted included different combinations of the following terms: (intercourse) AND (coitus) AND (vaginal perforation).

Methods of study selection: we report a case of vaginal evisceration after consensual intercourse in a young and healthy woman. In addition, we performed a systematic review of vaginal perforations with or without evisceration in women without prior surgery or any other predisposing disease. All studies identified were listed by citation, title, authors and abstract. Duplicates were identified by an independent manual screening, performed by one researcher and then removed. For the eligibility process, two authors independently screened the title and abstracts of all non-duplicated papers and excluded those not pertinent to the topic.

Tabulation, integration and results: We have followed the PRISMA guidelines. Five manuscripts were detected through the references of the works that had been identified with the research on MEDLINE (PubMed), Scopus, Embase and Web of Science. We found 16 cases between 1980 and 2020. The young age and the virginal status represent the principal risk factors and all the lacerations occurred in the posterior vaginal fornix. The most common surgical technique was the laparotomic approach and, in the remaining cases, the laparoscopic and vaginal route was performed.

Conclusions: Post-coital vaginal perforation and evisceration in women with no prior pelvic surgery is a rare condition in the clinical practice and, when it is associated with evisceration it is a surgical emergency. Usually, these injuries are not life-threatening conditions but, a delay in diagnosis, can lead to severe complications. In consideration of the high heterogeneity of the data in the literature, it is essential to define a diagnostic-therapeutic management for the patients with vaginal perforation. With our review, we try to identify the associated risk factors, the best and fastest diagnosis, and the best surgical approach. We believe that a combined vaginal and laparoscopic approach can be the best surgical treatment, useful to diagnose injuries of the abdominal organs and to improve postoperative outcome.

Keywords: evisceration; laparoscopy; postcoital; sexual intercourse; vaginal perforation; vaginal rupture.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Evidence of vaginal perforation.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Peritoneal perforation in the right posterior fornix.
Figure 3
Figure 3
The laparoscopic view shows unincorporated and bleeding peritoneal edges.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Laparoscopic repair using 0 Vicryl detached stitch suture.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Study Design.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Croak A.J., Gebhart J.B., Klingele C.J., Schroeder G., Lee R.A., Podratz K.C. Characteristics of Patients With Vaginal Rupture and Evisceration. Obstet. Gynecol. 2004;103:572–576. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000115507.26155.45. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Padoa A., Fishman N.G., Tsviban A., Smorgick N. Vaginal postcoital injuries requiring surgical intervention: A case series and literature review. Int. J. Impot. Res. 2021;33:110–117. doi: 10.1038/s41443-020-0234-8. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Symeonidis N., Ballas K., Micha A., Psarras K., Pavlidis T. Consensual Intercourse Resulting in an Extensive Rectovaginal Tear: An Extremely Rare Occurrence. J. Sex. Med. 2015;12:572–575. doi: 10.1111/jsm.12754. - DOI - PubMed
    1. King B.M. Average-Size Erect Penis: Fiction, Fact, and the Need for Counseling. J. Sex Marital Ther. 2021;47:80–89. doi: 10.1080/0092623X.2020.1787279. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Moher D., Liberati A., Tetzlaff J., Altman D.G., The PRISMA Group Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement. PLoS Med. 2009;6:e1000097. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types