Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Sep 20;10(18):4267.
doi: 10.3390/jcm10184267.

Importance of Translabial Ultrasound for the Diagnosis of Pelvic Organ Prolapse and Its Correlation with the POP-Q Examination: Analysis of 363 Cases

Affiliations

Importance of Translabial Ultrasound for the Diagnosis of Pelvic Organ Prolapse and Its Correlation with the POP-Q Examination: Analysis of 363 Cases

Gina Nam et al. J Clin Med. .

Abstract

The incidence of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is increasing in our aging society. We aimed to evaluate the clinical usefulness of translabial ultrasound (TLUS) by comparing the findings of POP-Q examination and TLUS in advanced POP patients and we also aimed to evaluate the prevalence of rectocele and enterocele on the TLUS. We analyzed the TLUS and POP-Q exam findings of 363 symptomatic POP patients who visited our clinic from March 2019 to April 2021. We excluded three patients who had conditions mimicking POP, as revealed by the TLUS. The most common POP type was anterior compartment POP (68.61%), followed by apical compartment (38.61%) and posterior compartment (16.11%) POP. Agreement between the POP-Q exam and TLUS was tested using Cohen's kappa (κ). p values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. The incidence of rectocele or enterocele was only 1.67% (6/360) and there was no rectocele or enterocele in most patients (246/252, 96.63%) when the POP-Q exam revealed posterior compartment POP, suggesting that they only had posterior vaginal wall relaxation. The positive predictive value of the POP-Q exam for detecting rectocele or enterocele (as revealed by TLUS) was only 2.38%, whereas the negative predictive value was 100%. In conclusion, the application of TLUS is useful in the diagnosis of POP, especially for differentiation of true POP from conditions mimicking POP. The correlation between the POP-Q exam and TLUS is low, especially in posterior compartment POP, and therefore, patients with POP-Q exam findings suggesting posterior compartment POP should undergo TLUS to check for rectocele or enterocele. The use of TLUS in the diagnosis of POP patients can improve the accuracy of the diagnosis of POP patients in conjunction with a POP-Q exam.

Keywords: enterocele; pelvic organ prolapse; pelvic organ prolapse quantification (POP-Q); rectocele; translabial ultrasound.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no potential conflicts of interest to disclose.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Conditions mimicking pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and true POP. (A,B) anterior vaginal wall leiomyoma mimicking anterior compartment POP. (C) Urethral diverticulum mimicking anterior compartment POP. (D) Rectocele and (E) enterocele revealed by translabial ultrasonography.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Translabial ultrasonography (A) in resting phase. Rectovaginal septum (arrowheads). AC, anal canal; B, bladder; PS, pubis symphysis; RA, rectal ampulla; U, urethra; V, vagina. Translabial ultrasonography in patients with (B) rectocele and (C) enterocele in maximal Valsalva phase. Rectocele filled with stool and air, resulting in hyperechogenicity, and the defect of the rectovaginal septum is observed in the maximal Valsalva maneuver (B). The contents of an enterocele appear generally iso- to hyperechogenic compared with a rectocele and bowel peristalsis is usually observed in the enterocele sac (C). R, rectocele; E, enterocele.

References

    1. Yuk J.-S., Lee J.H., Hur J.-Y., Shin J.-H. The prevalence and treatment pattern of clinically diagnosed pelvic organ prolapse: A Korean National Health Insurance Database-based cross-sectional study 2009–2015. Sci. Rep. 2018;8:1–6. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-19692-5. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Digesu G.A., Chaliha C., Salvatore S., Hutchings A., Khullar V. The relationship of vaginal prolapse severity tosymptoms and quality of life. BJOG Int. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 2005;112:971–976. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2005.00568.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Nygaard I., Bradley C., Brandt D. Pelvic organ prolapse in older women: Prevalence and risk factors. Obstet. Gynecol. 2004;104:489–497. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000136100.10818.d8. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Smith F.J., Holman C.A.J., Moorin R.E., Tsokos N. Lifetime risk of undergoing surgery for pelvic organ prolapse. Obstet. Gynecol. 2010;116:1096–1100. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181f73729. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Oliphant S.S., Jones K.A., Wang L., Bunker C.H., Lowder J.L. Trends over time with commonly performed obstetric and gynecologic inpatient procedures. Obstet. Gynecol. 2010;116:926. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181f38599. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources