Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Sep 20;10(18):4269.
doi: 10.3390/jcm10184269.

Sepsis and Cognitive Assessment

Affiliations
Review

Sepsis and Cognitive Assessment

Laura C Jones et al. J Clin Med. .

Abstract

Sepsis disproportionally affects people over the age of 65, and with an exponentially increasing older population, sepsis poses additional risks for cognitive decline. This review summarizes published literature for (1) authorship qualification; (2) the type of cognitive domains most often assessed; (3) timelines for cognitive assessment; (4) the control group and analysis approach, and (5) sociodemographic reporting. Using key terms, a PubMed database review from January 2000 to January 2021 identified 3050 articles, and 234 qualified as full text reviews with 18 ultimately retained as summaries. More than half (61%) included an author with an expert in cognitive assessment. Seven (39%) relied on cognitive screening tools for assessment with the remaining using a combination of standard neuropsychological measures. Cognitive domains typically assessed were declarative memory, attention and working memory, processing speed, and executive function. Analytically, 35% reported on education, and 17% included baseline (pre-sepsis) data. Eight (44%) included a non-sepsis peer group. No study considered sex or race/diversity in the statistical model, and only five studies reported on race/ethnicity, with Caucasians making up the majority (74%). Of the articles with neuropsychological measures, researchers report acute with cognitive improvement over time for sepsis survivors. The findings suggest avenues for future study designs.

Keywords: aging; cognitive assessment; sepsis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Publication Identification Process.

References

    1. Gotts J., Matthay M. Sepsis: Pathophysiology and clinical management. BMJ. 2016;353:i1585. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i1585. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kumar G., Kumar N., Taneja A., Kaleekal T., Tarima S., McGinley E., Jimenez E., Mohan A., Khan R.A., Whittle J., et al. Nationwide Trends of Severe Sepsis in the 21st Century (2000–2007) Chest. 2011;140:1223–1231. doi: 10.1378/chest.11-0352. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Martin G.S., Mannino D., Eaton S., Moss M. The Epidemiology of Sepsis in the United States from 1979 through 2000. N. Engl. J. Med. 2003;348:1546–1554. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa022139. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Singer M., Deutschman C.S., Seymour C.C., Shankar-Hari M., Annane D., Bauer M., Bellomo R., Bernard G.R., Chiche J.-D., Coopersmith C.C.M., et al. The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3) JAMA. 2016;315:801–810. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.0287. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hajj J., Blaine N., Salavaci J., Jacoby D. The “Centrality of Sepsis”: A Review on Incidence, Mortality, and Cost of Care. Healthcare. 2018;6:90. doi: 10.3390/healthcare6030090. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources