Update on Robotic Total Mesorectal Excision for Rectal Cancer
- PMID: 34575677
- PMCID: PMC8472541
- DOI: 10.3390/jpm11090900
Update on Robotic Total Mesorectal Excision for Rectal Cancer
Abstract
The minimally invasive treatment of rectal cancer with Total Mesorectal Excision is a complex and challenging procedure due to technical and anatomical issues which could impair postoperative, oncological and functional outcomes, especially in a defined subgroup of patients. The results from recent randomized controlled trials comparing laparoscopic versus open surgery are still conflicting and trans-anal bottom-up approaches have recently been developed. Robotic surgery represents the latest consistent innovation in the field of minimally invasive surgery that may potentially overcome the technical limitations of conventional laparoscopy thanks to an enhanced dexterity, especially in deep narrow operative fields such as the pelvis. Results from population-based multicenter studies have shown the potential advantages of robotic surgery when compared to its laparoscopic counterpart in terms of reduced conversions, complication rates and length of stay. Costs, often advocated as one of the main drawbacks of robotic surgery, should be thoroughly evaluated including both the direct and indirect costs, with the latter having the potential of counterbalancing the excess of expenditure directly related to the purchase and maintenance of robotic equipment. Further prospectively maintained or randomized data are still required to better delineate the advantages of the robotic platform, especially in the subset of most complex and technically challenging patients from both an anatomical and oncological standpoint.
Keywords: rectal cancer; robotic low anterior resection; robotic surgery; total mesorectal excision.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Figures
References
-
- Lacy A.M., Tasende M.M., Delgado S., Fernandez-Hevia M., Jimenez M., De Lacy B., Castells A., Bravo R., Wexner S.D., Heald R.J. Transanal Total Mesorectal Excision for Rectal Cancer: Outcomes after 140 Patients. J. Am. Coll. Surg. 2015;221:415–423. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2015.03.046. - DOI - PubMed
-
- González-Abós C., De Lacy F.B., Guzmán Y., Nogueira S.T., Otero-Piñeiro A., Almenara R., Lacy A.M. Transanal total mesorectal excision for stage II or III rectal cancer: Pattern of local recurrence in a tertiary referral center. Surg. Endosc. 2021:1–9. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-08200-4. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Deijen C.L., Velthuis S., Tsai A., Mavroveli S., Klerk E.S.M.D.L.-D., Sietses C., Tuynman J.B., Lacy A.M., Hanna G.B., Bonjer H.J. COLOR III: A multicentre randomised clinical trial comparing transanal TME versus laparoscopic TME for mid and low rectal cancer. Surg. Endosc. 2016;30:3210–3215. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4615-x. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Roodbeen S.X., Penna M., MacKenzie H., Kusters M., Slater A., Jones O.M., Lindsey I., Guy R.J., Cunningham C., Hompes R. Transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) versus laparoscopic TME for MRI-defined low rectal cancer: A propensity score-matched analysis of oncological outcomes. Surg. Endosc. 2019;33:2459–2467. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6530-4. - DOI - PMC - PubMed