Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Sep 13;11(9):910.
doi: 10.3390/jpm11090910.

Application of a 72 h National Early Warning Score and Incorporation with Sequential Organ Failure Assessment for Predicting Sepsis Outcomes and Risk Stratification in an Intensive Care Unit: A Derivation and Validation Cohort Study

Affiliations

Application of a 72 h National Early Warning Score and Incorporation with Sequential Organ Failure Assessment for Predicting Sepsis Outcomes and Risk Stratification in an Intensive Care Unit: A Derivation and Validation Cohort Study

Chih-Yi Hsu et al. J Pers Med. .

Abstract

We investigated the best timing for using the National Early Warning Score 2 (NEWS2) for predicting sepsis outcomes and whether combining the NEWS2 and the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) was applicable for mortality risk stratification in intensive care unit (ICU) patients with severe sepsis. All adult patients who met the Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock criteria between August 2013 and January 2017 with complete clinical parameters and laboratory data were enrolled as a derivation cohort. The primary outcomes were the 7-, 14-, 21-, and 28-day mortalities. Furthermore, another group of patients under the same setting between January 2020 and March 2020 were also enrolled as a validation cohort. In the derivation cohort, we included 699 consecutive adult patients. The 72 h NEWS2 had good discrimination for predicting 7-, 14-, 21-, and 28-day mortalities (AUC: 0.780, 0.724, 0.700, and 0.667, respectively) and was not inferior to the SOFA (AUC: 0.740, 0.680, 0.684, and 0.677, respectively). With the new combined NESO tool, the hazard ratio was 1.854 (1.203-2.950) for the intermediate-risk group and 6.810 (3.927-11.811) for the high-risk group relative to the low-risk group. This finding was confirmed in the validation cohort using a separated survival curve for 28-day mortality. The 72 h NEWS2 alone was non-inferior to the admission SOFA or day 3 SOFA for predicting sepsis outcomes. The NESO tool was found to be useful for 7-, 14-, 21-, and 28-day mortality risk stratification in patients with severe sepsis.

Keywords: National Early Warning Score 2; Sequential Organ Failure Assessment; intensive care unit; mortality risk stratification; severe sepsis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Study flowchart: (a) derivation cohort; (b) validation cohort.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Mortality and survival curves over 28 days in the derivation cohort via the NESO tool. (a) Mortality within 7, 14, 21, and 28 days among the low-risk, intermediate-risk, and severe-risk groups, which were stratified using the admission SOFA and the 72 h NEWS2; (b) survival curves for the three groups, which were stratified using the admission SOFA and the 72 h NEWS2.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Mortality and survival curves over 28 days in the validation cohort via the NESO tool. (a) Mortality within 7, 14, 21, and 28 days among the low-risk, intermediate-risk, and severe-risk groups, which were stratified using the admission SOFA and the 72 h NEWS2; (b) survival curves among the three groups, which were stratified using the admission SOFA and the 72 h NEWS2.

References

    1. Murphy S.L., Kochanek K.D., Xu J. Deaths: Final data for 2011. Natl. Vital Stat. Rep. 2015;63:3. - PubMed
    1. Chen Y.-J., Chen F.-L., Chen J.-H., Wu M.-T.M., Chen Y.-L., Chien D.-S., Ko Y.J.M. Epidemiology of sepsis in Taiwan. Medicine. 2019;98:e15725. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000015725. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mouncey P.R., Osborn T.M., Power G.S., Harrison D.A., Sadique M.Z., Grieve R.D., Jahan R., Harvey S.E., Bell D., Bion J.F., et al. Trial of early, goal-directed resuscitation for septic shock. N. Engl. J. Med. 2015;372:1301–1311. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1500896. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sakr Y., Jaschinski U., Wittebole X., Szakmany T., Lipman J., Ñamendys-Silva S.A., Martin-Loeches I., Leone M., Lupu M.-N., Vincent J.-L. Sepsis in intensive care unit patients: Worldwide data from the intensive care over nations audit. Open Forum Infect. Dis. 2018;5:ofy313. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofy313. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Seymour C.W., Liu V.X., Iwashyna T.J., Brunkhorst F.M., Rea T.D., Scherag A., Rubenfeld G., Kahn J.M., Shankar-Hari M., Singer M.J.J. Assessment of clinical criteria for sepsis: For the Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3) Jama. 2016;315:762–774. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.0288. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources