Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Sep 21;13(9):1882.
doi: 10.3390/v13091882.

Mutation Rates, Mutation Frequencies, and Proofreading-Repair Activities in RNA Virus Genetics

Affiliations
Review

Mutation Rates, Mutation Frequencies, and Proofreading-Repair Activities in RNA Virus Genetics

Esteban Domingo et al. Viruses. .

Abstract

The error rate displayed during template copying to produce viral RNA progeny is a biologically relevant parameter of the replication complexes of viruses. It has consequences for virus-host interactions, and it represents the first step in the diversification of viruses in nature. Measurements during infections and with purified viral polymerases indicate that mutation rates for RNA viruses are in the range of 10-3 to 10-6 copying errors per nucleotide incorporated into the nascent RNA product. Although viruses are thought to exploit high error rates for adaptation to changing environments, some of them possess misincorporation correcting activities. One of them is a proofreading-repair 3' to 5' exonuclease present in coronaviruses that may decrease the error rate during replication. Here we review experimental evidence and models of information maintenance that explain why elevated mutation rates have been preserved during the evolution of RNA (and some DNA) viruses. The models also offer an interpretation of why error correction mechanisms have evolved to maintain the stability of genetic information carried out by large viral RNA genomes such as the coronaviruses.

Keywords: RNA virus; SARS-CoV-2; error catastrophe; exonuclease; quasispecies; virus diversification.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Scheme that illustrates the difference between mutation rate and mutant frequency. Residue U (on the left), A (in the middle), and C (on the right) can be misread to incorporate a G (on the left), C (in the middle), or A (on the right) in the complementary strand at a rate of 10−4 substitutions per nucleotide in all cases. The replicative capacity of the newly G, C, and A templates determines the different mutant frequencies with 10−3, 10−4, and 10−5 substitutions per nucleotide, respectively.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Scheme that illustrates mutant spectrum complexities in the absence and presence of a 3′-5′ exonuclease activity during viral replication. Residue A (on the top) can be misread to incorporate a C in the complementary strand. In the presence of a proofreading activity, the mutant spectrum (represented by lines with mutations as colored symbols) contains a standard number of defective genomes (depicted on the left). In the absence of a proofreading activity, there is an accumulation of mutations per genome that can eliminate viral replication (indicated by discontinuous lines of mutant spectrum on the right).

References

    1. Eigen M., Schuster P. Stages of emerging life—five principles of early organization. J. Mol. Evol. 1982;19:47–61. doi: 10.1007/BF02100223. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Eigen M. Oxford University Press; Oxford, UK: 1992. Steps towards Life.
    1. Kauffman S.A. Self-Organization and Selection in Evolution. Oxford University Press; New York, NY, USA: Oxford, UK: 1993. The Origins of Order.
    1. De Duve C. Life Evolving. Molecules, Mind and Meaning. Oxford University Press; Oxford, UK: 2002.
    1. Domingo E. Virus as Populations. 2nd ed. Academic Press, Elsevier; Amsterdam, The Netherlands: 2020.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources