Determination of thresholds of risk in women at average risk of breast cancer to personalize the organized screening program
- PMID: 34580360
- PMCID: PMC8476568
- DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-98604-6
Determination of thresholds of risk in women at average risk of breast cancer to personalize the organized screening program
Abstract
In France, more than 10 million women at "average" risk of breast cancer (BC), are included in the organized BC screening. Existing predictive models of BC risk are not adapted to the French population. Thus, we set up a new score in the French Hérault region and looked for subgroups at a graded level of risk in women at "average" risk. We recruited a retrospective cohort of women, aged 50 to 60, who underwent the organized BC screening, and included 2241 non-cancer women and 527 who developed a BC during a 12-year follow-up period (2006-2018). The risk factors identified were high breast density (ACR BI-RADS grading)(B vs A: HR = 1.41, 95%CI [1.05; 1.9], p = 0.023; C vs A: HR = 1.65 [1.2; 2.27], p = 0.02 ; D vs A: HR = 2.11 [1.25;3.58], p = 0.006), a history of maternal breast cancer (HR = 1.61 [1.24; 2.09], p < 0.001), and socioeconomic difficulties (HR 1.23 [1.09; 1.55], p = 0.003). While early menopause (HR = 0.36 [0.13; 0.99], p = 0.003) and an age at menarche after 12 years (HR = 0.77 [0.63; 0.95], p = 0.047) were protective factors. We identified 3 groups at risk: lower, average, and higher, respectively. A low threshold was characterized at 1.9% of 12-year risk and a high threshold at 4.5% 12-year risk. Mean 12-year risks in the 3 groups of risk were 1.37%, 2.68%, and 5.84%, respectively. Thus, 12% of women presented a level of risk different from the average risk group, corresponding to 600,000 women involved in the French organized BC screening, enabling to propose a new strategy to personalize the national BC screening. On one hand, for women at lower risk, we proposed to reduce the frequency of mammograms and on the other hand, for women at higher risk, we suggested intensifying surveillance.
© 2021. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no competing interests.
Figures
Similar articles
-
The effect of organized breast cancer screening on mammography use: Evidence from France.Health Econ. 2018 Dec;27(12):1963-1980. doi: 10.1002/hec.3813. Epub 2018 Aug 6. Health Econ. 2018. PMID: 30084221
-
Breast Cancer Mortality After Implementation of Organized Population-Based Breast Cancer Screening in Norway.J Natl Cancer Inst. 2020 Aug 1;112(8):839-846. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djz220. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2020. PMID: 31848605
-
Proportion of women with self-reported opportunistic mammography before organized screening.Acta Oncol. 2016 Jul;55(7):865-9. doi: 10.3109/0284186X.2016.1171392. Epub 2016 May 4. Acta Oncol. 2016. PMID: 27144814
-
Evaluation of the association between mammographic density and the risk of breast cancer using Quantra software and the BI-RADS classification.Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Nov 13;99(46):e23112. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000023112. Medicine (Baltimore). 2020. PMID: 33181680 Free PMC article.
-
[Screening for breast cancer: worries about its effectiveness].Rev Prat. 2013 Dec;63(10):1369-77. Rev Prat. 2013. PMID: 24579331 Review. French.
Cited by
-
Understanding the contribution of lifestyle in breast cancer risk prediction: a systematic review of models applicable to Europe.BMC Cancer. 2023 Jul 21;23(1):687. doi: 10.1186/s12885-023-11174-w. BMC Cancer. 2023. PMID: 37480028 Free PMC article.
-
Alcohol consumption and breast lesions: targets for risk-based screening in high-risk Italian women.Breast Cancer. 2025 May 16. doi: 10.1007/s12282-025-01720-8. Online ahead of print. Breast Cancer. 2025. PMID: 40380018
-
Predicting Quality of Life in Women with Breast Cancer Who Engage in Physical Exercise: The Role of Psychological Variables.Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Jul 21;11(14):2088. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11142088. Healthcare (Basel). 2023. PMID: 37510529 Free PMC article.
-
Breast cancer and physical activity: A bibliometric analysis.Front Oncol. 2023 Jan 12;12:1051482. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.1051482. eCollection 2022. Front Oncol. 2023. PMID: 36713550 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Santé publique france. Sante publique france - Cancers. Tech. Rep. https://www.santepubliquefrance.fr/maladies-et-traumatismes/cancers. (2021).
-
- Lefeuvre, D., Catajar, N., Le, C., Benjamin, B. & Bousquet, P. J. Dépistage du cancer du sein : impact sur les trajectoires de soins. Tech. Rep., Institut national du cancer (2018). https://www.e-cancer.fr/content/download/238001/3268333/file/Depistage_d....
-
- Haute Autorité de Santé. Dépistage du cancer du sein en France : identification des femmes à haut risque et modalités de dépistage. Tech. Rep., HAS (2014). www.has-sante.fr.
-
- Santé publique France. Taux de participation au programme de dépistage organisé du cancer du sein 2018-2019 et évolution depuis 2005. Tech. Rep., Santé publique France (2020). https://www.santepubliquefrance.fr/maladies-et-traumatismes/cancers/canc....
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical