Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Sep 27;18(3):181-189.
doi: 10.4274/tjod.galenos.2021.68822.

The combined effect of anti-D and non-D Rh antibodies in maternal alloimmunization

Affiliations

The combined effect of anti-D and non-D Rh antibodies in maternal alloimmunization

Zeynep Gedik Özköse et al. Turk J Obstet Gynecol. .

Abstract

Objective: This study aims to investigate the distribution of antibodies that cause hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn (HDFN) and compare the clinical outcomes of pregnancies affected by anti-D and anti-D combined with non-D Rh alloimmunization.

Materials and methods: We retrospectively searched and obtained the perinatal and neonatal data of patients with anti-D antibodies and anti-D combined with non-D Rh antibodies (anti-c, -C, -e, -E, and -Kell) from October 2015 to December 2018 at the University of Health Sciences Turkey, Kanuni Sultan Süleyman Training and Research Hospital. Univariate and multiple logistic regression analyses and adjusted odds ratios with their confidence intervals were used to define independent risk factors for non-D antibody positive.

Results: The severe fetal hydrops rate was significantly higher in the anti-D combined non-D group (3/25, 12%) than in the anti-D group (1/128, 0.08%, p<0.001). The intrauterine transfusion (IUT) requirement in the anti-D combined non-D group (16/25, 64%) tended to be significantly higher than that in the anti-D group (5/128, 7.46%, p<0.001). The incidence of neonatal exchange transfusion, top-up transfusion, and postnatal phototherapy frequency in the anti-D combined non-D group was significantly higher than in the anti-D group.

Conclusion: Anti-D combined with another non-D Rh alloantibody resulted in significantly higher HDFN rates than the anti-D alloimmunized pregnancies. Also, anti-D in association with non-D Rh antibodies resulted in more severe HDFN requiring more invasive treatment procedures, including IUT, neonatal exchange transfusion, or top-up transfusion.

Keywords: Fetal anemia; Rh alloimmunization; hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn; non-D antibodies.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest: The authors report no conflict of interest.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Raashid Y, Ali A, Ehsan Y, Jafri H, Waheed I, Mason G, et al. Intrauterine Fetal Blood Transfusion (IUBT) for Rh Incompatibility - 12 Years’ Experience from Pakistan. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2020;30:1193–6. - PubMed
    1. Sahoo T, Sahoo M, Gulla KM, Gupta M. Rh alloimmunisation: current updates in antenatal and postnatal Management. Indian J Pediatr. 2020;87:1018–28. - PubMed
    1. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 192: management of alloimmunization during pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 2018;131:e82-90. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002528. [Internet] - PubMed
    1. Zipursky A, Paul VK. The global burden of Rh disease. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2011;96:F84–5. - PubMed
    1. de Haas M, Thurik FF, Koelewijn JM, van der Schoot CE. Haemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn. Vox Sang. 2015;109:99–113. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources