Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Sep 27;36(37):e253.
doi: 10.3346/jkms.2021.36.e253.

Lack of Acceptance of Digital Healthcare in the Medical Market: Addressing Old Problems Raised by Various Clinical Professionals and Developing Possible Solutions

Affiliations
Review

Lack of Acceptance of Digital Healthcare in the Medical Market: Addressing Old Problems Raised by Various Clinical Professionals and Developing Possible Solutions

Jong Il Park et al. J Korean Med Sci. .

Abstract

Various digital healthcare devices and apps, such as blood glucose meters, blood pressure monitors, and step-trackers are commonly used by patients; however, digital healthcare devices have not been widely accepted in the medical market as of yet. Despite the various legal and privacy issues involved in their use, the main reason for its poor acceptance is that users do not use such devices voluntarily and continuously. Digital healthcare devices generally do not provide valuable information to users except for tracking self-checked glucose or walking. To increase the use of these devices, users must first understand the health data produced in the context of their personal health, and the devices must be easy to use and integrated into everyday life. Thus, users need to know how to manage their own data. Medical staff must teach and encourage users to analyze and manage their patient-generated healthcare data, and users should be able to find medical values from these digital devices. Eventually, a single customized service that can comprehensively analyze various medical data to provide valuable customized services to users, and which can be linked to various heterogeneous digital healthcare devices based on the integration of various health data should be developed. Digital healthcare professionals should have detailed knowledge about a variety of digital healthcare devices and fully understand the advantages and disadvantages of digital healthcare to help patients understand and embrace the use of such devices.

Keywords: Delivery of Health Care; Nurses; Pharmacists; Quality of Health Care; Wearable Electronic Devices.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no potential conflicts of interest to disclose.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. Repetitive vicious cycle structure of the use of digital healthcare and avoidance alternative.
When creating a single digital healthcare devices or app, it must be designed so that each of these steps can be carried out from the beginning. Therefore, collaboration between medical staff and industry professionals and active intervention by medical staff from the beginning is important.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2. Integrated digital healthcare devices linkage solution.
One type of medical data does not provide adequate information about health conditions. It is necessary to use a variety of digital healthcare devices and to simplify the use of the app. It is also necessary to prepare an integrative system that can properly collect and analyze various data.

References

    1. Fagherazzi G, Goetzinger C, Rashid MA, Aguayo GA, Huiart L. Digital health strategies to fight COVID-19 worldwide: challenges, recommendations, and a call for papers. J Med Internet Res. 2020;22(6):e19284. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kim HS. Lessons from temporary telemedicine initiated owing to outbreak of COVID-19. Healthc Inform Res. 2020;26(2):159–161. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sharma A, Harrington RA, McClellan MB, Turakhia MP, Eapen ZJ, Steinhubl S, et al. Using digital health technology to better generate evidence and deliver evidence-based care. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018;71(23):2680–2690. - PubMed
    1. Kim HS, Yoon KH. Lessons from use of continuous glucose monitoring systems in digital healthcare. Endocrinol Metab (Seoul) 2020;35(3):541–548. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dunn P, Hazzard E. Technology approaches to digital health literacy. Int J Cardiol. 2019;293:294–296. - PubMed

MeSH terms