Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Nov 1;49(5):2345-2355.
doi: 10.1042/BST20210431.

Structure determination of GPCRs: cryo-EM compared with X-ray crystallography

Affiliations
Review

Structure determination of GPCRs: cryo-EM compared with X-ray crystallography

Javier García-Nafría et al. Biochem Soc Trans. .

Abstract

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are the largest single family of cell surface receptors encoded by the human genome and they play pivotal roles in co-ordinating cellular systems throughout the human body, making them ideal drug targets. Structural biology has played a key role in defining how receptors are activated and signal through G proteins and β-arrestins. The application of structure-based drug design (SBDD) is now yielding novel compounds targeting GPCRs. There is thus significant interest from both academia and the pharmaceutical industry in the structural biology of GPCRs as currently only about one quarter of human non-odorant receptors have had their structure determined. Initially, all the structures were determined by X-ray crystallography, but recent advances in electron cryo-microscopy (cryo-EM) now make GPCRs tractable targets for single-particle cryo-EM with comparable resolution to X-ray crystallography. So far this year, 78% of the 99 GPCR structures deposited in the PDB (Jan-Jul 2021) were determined by cryo-EM. Cryo-EM has also opened up new possibilities in GPCR structural biology, such as determining structures of GPCRs embedded in a lipid nanodisc and multiple GPCR conformations from a single preparation. However, X-ray crystallography still has a number of advantages, particularly in the speed of determining many structures of the same receptor bound to different ligands, an essential prerequisite for effective SBDD. We will discuss the relative merits of cryo-EM and X-ray crystallography for the structure determination of GPCRs and the future potential of both techniques.

Keywords: G-protein-coupled receptors; cryo-electron microscopy; crystallography.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

C.G.T. is a shareholder, consultant and member of the Scientific Advisory Board of Sosei Heptares, a GPCR drug Discovery company. J.G.N. declares no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. GPCR structures.
(A) Cartoon of β2AR indicating the conformational change from the inactive state (blue; PDB ID 2RH1) [20] to the active state (purple; PDB ID 3SN6) [26] when coupled to a G protein (not shown). (B) Cryo-EM density for the serotonin 5-HT1B receptor coupled to the heterotrimeric G protein Go (PDB ID 6G79, EMDB-4358) [79]. The detergent used for purification of the receptor was decylmaltoside. (C) Cryo-EM density for the β1-adrenoceptor coupled to β-arrestin (PDB 6TKO, EMDB-10515) [9]. The detergent-purified receptor was reconstituted into a lipid nanodisc containing a bilayer of phosphatidylcholine and phosphatidylglycerol and has an external diameter of ∼13 nm. (D) Percentage of GPCR structures in the Protein Data Bank (PDB) determined by cryo-EM per year. (E) Cumulative number of GPCR structures determined by X-ray crystallography and cryo-EM, which includes multiple structures of the same receptor bound to different ligands, different intracellular binding partners and different species. Note that in panels D and E the data for 2021 includes only the first 7 months of the year.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. Artefacts in X-ray crystallography.
(A) 60° kink of H1 in chain A (brown) of β1AR compared with chain B (green); PDB ID 2VT4 [23]. (B) Different pose of the methylphenoxy moiety of carmoterol in chain A (brown) compared with chain B (green); PDB ID 2Y02 [59]. (C) The salt bridge in the extracellular region of A2AR determined in the crystal structure at pH 4.8 (PDB ID 5G53) [32] is absent from the cryo-EM structure determined at pH 7.5 (PDB ID 6GDG) [57]. (D) The RMSD differences (rainbow colouration) between β1AR crystallised in detergent (PDB ID 2VT4) compared with β1AR crystallised in lipidic cubic phase (PDB ID 4BVN) were determined and plotted on the structure (red, large differences; dark blue, no differences) [58]. Panel 2D has been reproduced from [58].

References

    1. Rosenbaum, D.M., Rasmussen, S.G. and Kobilka, B.K. (2009) The structure and function of G-protein-coupled receptors. Nature 459, 356–363 10.1038/nature08144 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Venkatakrishnan, A.J., Deupi, X., Lebon, G., Tate, C.G., Schertler, G.F. and Babu, M.M. (2013) Molecular signatures of G-protein-coupled receptors. Nature 494, 185–194 10.1038/nature11896 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hauser, A.S., Attwood, M.M., Rask-Andersen, M., Schioth, H.B. and Gloriam, D.E. (2017) Trends in GPCR drug discovery: new agents, targets and indications. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 16, 829–842 10.1038/nrd.2017.178 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Oldham, W.M. and Hamm, H.E. (2008) Heterotrimeric G protein activation by G-protein-coupled receptors. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 9, 60–71 10.1038/nrm2299 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wootten, D., Christopoulos, A., Marti-Solano, M., Babu, M.M. and Sexton, P.M. (2018) Mechanisms of signalling and biased agonism in G protein-coupled receptors. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 19, 638–653 10.1038/s41580-018-0049-3 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types