Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Practice Guideline
. 2021 Sep 28;5(18):3668-3689.
doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2021004394C.

American Society of Hematology 2021 guidelines for sickle cell disease: stem cell transplantation

Affiliations
Practice Guideline

American Society of Hematology 2021 guidelines for sickle cell disease: stem cell transplantation

Julie Kanter et al. Blood Adv. .

Abstract

Background: Sickle cell disease (SCD) is a life-limiting inherited hemoglobinopathy that results in significant complications and affects quality of life. Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is currently the only curative intervention for SCD; however, guidelines are needed to inform how to apply HSCT in clinical practice.

Objective: These evidence-based guidelines of the American Society of Hematology (ASH) are intended to support patients, clinicians, and health professionals in their decisions about HSCT for SCD.

Methods: The multidisciplinary guideline panel formed by ASH included 2 patient representatives and was balanced to minimize potential bias from conflicts of interest. The Mayo Evidence-Based Practice Research Program supported the guideline development process, including performing systematic evidence reviews (through 2019). The panel prioritized clinical questions and outcomes according to their importance for clinicians and patients. The panel used the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach, including GRADE Evidence-to-Decision frameworks, to assess evidence and make recommendations, which were subject to public comment.

Results: The panel agreed on 8 recommendations to help patients and providers assess how individuals with SCD should consider the timing and type of HSCT.

Conclusions: The evidence review yielded no randomized controlled clinical trials for HSCT in SCD; therefore, all recommendations are based on very low certainty in the evidence. Key recommendations include considering HSCT for those with neurologic injury or recurrent acute chest syndrome at an early age and to improve nonmyeloablative regimens. Future research should include the development of a robust SCD registry to serve as a comparator for HSCT studies.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Schünemann HJ, Al-Ansary LA, Forland F, et al. ; Board of Trustees of the Guidelines International Network . Guidelines International Network: principles for disclosure of interests and management of conflicts in guidelines. Ann Intern Med. 2015;163(7):548-553. - PubMed
    1. Schünemann HJ, Wiercioch W, Etxeandia I, et al. . Guidelines 2.0: systematic development of a comprehensive checklist for a successful guideline enterprise. CMAJ. 2014;186(3):E123-E142. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Graham R, Mancher M, Miller Wolman D, Greenfield S, Steinberg E, eds; Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Standards for Developing Trustworthy Clinical Practice. Clinical Practice Guidelines We Can Trust. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2011. - PubMed
    1. Qaseem A, Forland F, Macbeth F, et al. . Guidelines International Network: toward international standards for clinical practice guidelines. 2012;156(7):525-531. - PubMed
    1. Schünemann HJ, Best D, Vist G, Oxman AD; GRADE Working Group .Letters, numbers, symbols and words: how to communicate grades of evidence and recommendations [published correction appears in CMAJ. 2004;170(7):1082]. CMAJ. 2003;169(7):677-680. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types