Rehabilitation protocols following rotator cuff repair: a meta-analysis of current evidence
- PMID: 34582083
- DOI: 10.1111/ans.17213
Rehabilitation protocols following rotator cuff repair: a meta-analysis of current evidence
Abstract
Background: Rotator cuff tears are a common shoulder pathology with an increasing incidence. The optimum post-operative rehab protocol remains unclear and can consist of either conservative rehabilitation or more aggressive early range-of-motion. Multiple studies have assessed these treatment protocols. This meta-analysis aims to compare post-operative clinical outcomes following either conservative or aggressive rehabilitation post rotator cuff repair.
Methods: A systematic electronic literature search was undertaken using a number of databases. Eligible studies included randomized control trials published between January 2013 and April 2019 in English with patients having had received rotator cuff repair. Post-operative clinical outcomes considered included shoulder range-of-motion, overall function status (Costant-Murley score) and rates of rotator-cuff re-tear. Studies were evaluated for methodological quality in accordance with the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) scale. Summarized pooled statistics were calculated using Review Manager (v5.3) software.
Results: A total of six randomized controlled trials were included. Standardized mean difference (SMD) in shoulder flexion, abduction and external rotation was not statistically significant at either 6 or 12 months post rotator cuff repair. Functional assessment suggests a slight benefit in Constant-Murley Score (SMD = 1.77; 95% CI -3.93, 7.47) in aggressive treatment groups with no significant risk increase for cuff re-tear (RR = 1.22; 95% CI 0.60, 2.47).
Conclusion: This meta-analysis suggests there is no clear benefit of either rehabilitation protocol when considering range-of-motion, with a possible benefit in functional outcome at the cost of increased re-tear risk post aggressive rehabilitation. Both protocols have been shown to offer safe reproducible short- and long-term outcomes.
Keywords: aggressive physiotherapy; arthroscopic reconstruction; delayed physiotherapy; meta-analysis; rotator cuff.
© 2021 Royal Australasian College of Surgeons.
References
-
- Littlewood C, Ashton J, Chance-Larsen K, May S, Sturrock B. Exercise for rotator cuff tendinopathy: a systematic review. Physiotherapy 2012; 98: 101-9.
-
- Oh LS, Wolf BR, Hall MP, Levy BA, Marx RG. Indications for rotator cuff repair: a systematic review. CClin Orthop Relat Res. 2007; 455:52-63. http://doi.org/10.1097/blo.0b013e31802fc175
-
- Liu J, Fan L, Zhu Y, Yu H, Xu T, Li G. Comparison of clinical outcomes in all-arthroscopic versus mini-open repair of rotator cuff tears. Medicine. 2017; 96(11): e6322. http://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000006322
-
- Lin TW, Cardenas L, Soslowsky LJ. Biomechanics of tendon injury and repair. Journal of Biomechanics. 2004; 37(6): 865-877. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2003.11.005
-
- Gimbel JA, Van Kleunen JP, Williams GR, Thomopoulos S., Soslowsky LJ. Long Durations of Immobilization in the Rat Result in Enhanced Mechanical Properties of the Healing Supraspinatus Tendon Insertion Site. Journal of Biomechanical Engineering. 2007; 129(3): 400-404. http://doi.org/10.1115/1.2721075
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
