21st Century Evidence: Randomized Controlled Trials Versus Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses
- PMID: 34582418
- PMCID: PMC8654119
- DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000005343
21st Century Evidence: Randomized Controlled Trials Versus Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses
Erratum in
-
21st Century Evidence: Randomized Controlled Trials Versus Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: Erratum.Crit Care Med. 2022 Feb 1;50(2):e220. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000005442. Crit Care Med. 2022. PMID: 35100207 No abstract available.
Conflict of interest statement
Dr. Sevransky’s institution received funding from the Center for Disease Control and Prevention Foundation, the Marcus Foundation, and the Society of Critical Care Medicine. The remaining authors have disclosed that they do not have any potential conflicts of interest.
References
-
- Walker E, Hernandez AV, Kattan MW: Meta-analysis: Its strengths and limitations. Cleve Clin J Med 2008; 75:431–439 - PubMed
-
- LeLorier J, Grégoire G, Benhaddad A, et al.: Discrepancies between meta-analyses and subsequent large randomized, controlled trials. N Engl J Med 1997; 337:536–542 - PubMed
-
- Rochwerg B, Oczkowski SJ, Siemieniuk RAC, et al.: Corticosteroids in sepsis: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit Care Med 2018; 46:1411–1420 - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources