Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2021 Oct:91:109-114.
doi: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2021.09.004. Epub 2021 Sep 8.

Diagnostic criteria for blepharospasm: A multicenter international study

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Diagnostic criteria for blepharospasm: A multicenter international study

Giovanni Defazio et al. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2021 Oct.

Abstract

Background: There are no widely accepted criteria to aid the physician in diagnosing BSP.

Objective: To validate recently proposed diagnostic criteria for blepharospasm in a larger and geographically diverse population and to develop a screening system for blepharospasm.

Methods: Video-recordings from 211 blepharospasm patients and 166 healthy/disease controls were examined by 8 raters. Agreement for presence of orbicularis oculi spasms, sensory trick, and increased blinking was measured by k statistics. Inability to voluntarily suppress the spasms was asked by the examiner but not captured in the video. Patients/controls were also requested to fill a self-administered questionnaire addressing relevant blepharospasm clinical aspects. The diagnosis at each site was the gold standard for sensitivity/specificity.

Results: All the study items yielded satisfactory inter/intra-observer agreement. Combination of items rather than each item alone reached satisfactory sensitivity/specificity. The combined algorithm started with recognition of spasms followed by sensory trick. In the absence of a sensory trick, including "increased blinking" or "inability to voluntarily suppress the spasms" or both items yielded 88-92% sensitivity and 79-83% specificity. No single question of the questionnaire yielded high sensitivity/specificity. Serial application of the questionnaire to our blepharospasm and control subjects and subsequent clinical examination of subjects screening positive by the validated diagnostic algorithms yielded 78-81% sensitivity and 83-91% specificity.

Conclusion: These results support the use of proposed diagnostic criteria in multi-ethnic, multi-center cohorts. We also propose a case-finding procedure to screen blepharospasm in a given population with less effort than would be required by examination of all subjects.

Keywords: Blepharospasm; Diagnosis; Dystonia.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosures relevant to this work

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest relevant to this work.

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Multistep blepharospasm-finding procedure in a group-based sample.

References

    1. Defazio G, Hallett M, Jinnah HA, Conte A, Berardelli A, Blepharospasm 40 years later, Mov. Disord 32 (2017) 498–509. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Conte A, Defazio G, Ferrazzano G, Hallett M, Macerollo A, Fabbrini G, Berardelli A, Is increased blinking a form of blepharospasm? Neurology 80 (2013) 2236–2241. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Berman BD, Groth CL, Sillau SH, et al., Risk of spread in adult-onset isolated focal dystonia: a prospective international cohort study, J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry (2019) 1–7. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Abbruzzese G, Berardelli A, Girlanda P, Marchese R, Martino D, Morgante F, Avanzino L, Colosimo C, Defazio G, Long-term assessment of the risk of spread in primary late-onset focal dystonia, J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 79 (2008) 392–396. - PubMed
    1. Defazio G, Ercoli T, Erro R, et al., Idiopathic non-task-specific upper limb dystonia, a neglected form of dystonia, Mov. Disord 35 (2020) 2038–2045. - PubMed

Publication types