Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jan;36(1):12-14.
doi: 10.1038/s41433-021-01774-w. Epub 2021 Sep 28.

Reassurance on false negatives in the Manchester COVID19 Urgent Eyecare Service (CUES)

Affiliations

Reassurance on false negatives in the Manchester COVID19 Urgent Eyecare Service (CUES)

Emma Williams et al. Eye (Lond). 2022 Jan.
No abstract available

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

M.J. is Clinical Director and W.C. is Clinical Governance Lead at Primary Eyecare Services, holder of the contract with Manchester CCG in relation to CUES and other primary care optometry delivered services.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. Flowchart for primary care CUES cases in Manchester and their subsequent management.
The proportion of potential false-negative cases we consider is seen within the context of all non-referred CUES episodes (871) versus the total number of episodes seen within the service in the evaluation timeline.

References

    1. Harper RA, Dhawahir-Scala F, Wilson H, Gunn PJG, Jinkinson M, Pretty IA, et al. Development and implementation of a Greater Manchester COVID19 Urgent Eyecare Service. Eye (Lond) 2021;35:705–8. doi: 10.1038/s41433-020-1042-6. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kanabar R, Craven W, Wilson H, Rietdyke R, Dhawahir-Scala F, Jinkinson M, et al. Evaluation of the Manchester COVID-19 Urgent Eyecare Service (CUES) Eye. 2021 doi: 10.1038/s41433-021-01522-0. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Devarajan N, Williams GS, Hopes M, O’Sullivan D, Jones D. The Carmarthenshire Glaucoma Referral Refinement Scheme, a safe and efficient screening service. Eye (Lond) 2011;25:43–9. doi: 10.1038/eye.2010.136. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ratnarajan G, Kean J, French K, Parker M, Bourne R. The false negative rate and the role for virtual review in a nationally evaluated glaucoma referral refinement scheme. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2015;35:577–81. doi: 10.1111/opo.12224. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gunn PJG, Marks JR, Konstantakopoulou E, Edgar DF, Lawrenson JG, Roberts SA, et al. Clinical effectiveness of the Manchester Glaucoma Enhanced Referral Scheme. Br J Ophthalmol. 2019;103:1066–71. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2018-312385. - DOI - PMC - PubMed