Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Sep 29;21(10):54.
doi: 10.1007/s11910-021-01139-6.

The Ties that Bind: Agnosia, Neglect and Selective Attention to Visual Scale

Affiliations
Review

The Ties that Bind: Agnosia, Neglect and Selective Attention to Visual Scale

Robert L Whitwell et al. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. .

Abstract

Purpose of review: Historical and contemporary treatments of visual agnosia and neglect regard these disorders as largely unrelated. It is thought that damage to different neural processes leads directly to one or the other condition, yet apperceptive variants of agnosia and object-centered variants of neglect share remarkably similar deficits in the quality of conscious experience. Here we argue for a closer association between "apperceptive" variants of visual agnosia and "object-centered" variants of visual neglect. We introduce a theoretical framework for understanding these conditions based on "scale attention", which refers to selecting boundary and surface information at different levels of the structural hierarchy in the visual array.

Recent findings: We review work on visual agnosia, the cortical structures and cortico-cortical pathways that underlie visual perception, visuospatial neglect and object-centered neglect, and attention to scale. We highlight direct and indirect pathways involved in these disorders and in attention to scale. The direct pathway involves the posterior vertical segments of the superior longitudinal fasciculus that are positioned to link the established dorsal and ventral attentional centers in the parietal cortex with structures in the inferior occipitotemporal cortex associated with visual apperceptive agnosia. The connections in the right hemisphere appear to be more important for visual conscious experience, whereas those in the left hemisphere appear to be more strongly associated with the planning and execution of visually guided grasps directed at multi-part objects such as tools. In the latter case, semantic and functional information must drive the selection of the appropriate hand posture and grasp points on the object. This view is supported by studies of grasping in patients with agnosia and in patients with neglect that show that the selection of grasp points when picking up a tool involves both scale attention and semantic contributions from inferotemporal cortex. The indirect pathways, which include the inferior fronto-occipital and horizontal components of the superior longitudinal fasciculi, involve the frontal lobe, working memory and the "multiple demands" network, which can shape the content of visual awareness through the maintenance of goal- and task-based abstractions and their influence on scale attention. Recent studies of human cortico-cortical pathways necessitate revisions to long-standing theoretical views on visual perception, visually guided action and their integrations. We highlight findings from a broad sample of seemingly disparate areas of research to support the proposal that attention to scale is necessary for typical conscious visual experience and for goal-directed actions that depend on functional and semantic information. Furthermore, we suggest that vertical pathways between the parietal and occipitotemporal cortex, along with indirect pathways that involve the premotor and prefrontal cortex, facilitate the operations of scale attention.

Keywords: Grasping; Object-centered neglect; Selective attention; Visual agnosia; Visual pathways; Visual perception.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance
    1. Martinaud O. Visual agnosia and focal brain injury. Revue Neurologique. 2017;173:451–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neurol.2017.07.009 . - DOI - PubMed
    1. Perrotta G. Agnosia: Definition, clinical contexts, neurobiological profiles and clinical treatments. Arch Gerontol Geriatr Res. 2020;5:031–5. https://doi.org/10.17352/aggr.000023 . - DOI
    1. Barton JJS. Disorder of higher visual function. Curr Opin in Neur. 2011;24:1–5. https://doi.org/10.1097/WCO.0b013e328341a5c2 . - DOI
    1. Biran I, Coslett HB. Visual Agnosia. Curr Neur and Neurosci Reports. 2003;3:508–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11910-003-0055-4 . - DOI
    1. Coslett H. Visual agnosia, in Marien P. & Abutalebi J. (eds.) Neuropsychological research: a review, pp. 249–266 (New York: Psychology Press, 2008). https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203938904 .

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources