Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Oct;114(4):309-318.
doi: 10.1002/aorn.13498.

Demystifying the Institutional Review Board

Demystifying the Institutional Review Board

Rodney W Hicks et al. AORN J. 2021 Oct.

Abstract

Perioperative nurses are responsible for generating and using evidence to improve patient care. To protect human participants during research activities, government regulations enacted after widely publicized research misconduct specify that institutions receiving federal funds must have an institutional review board (IRB) comprising at least five members. Board members have many responsibilities, including completing a thorough review of each section of the application and attachments (eg, consent documents). To expedite the IRB approval processes, applicants should create and submit a well-written application. Applicants should understand that the application addresses the important ethical concepts of respect for persons, beneficence, and justice. Quality improvement activities (ie, local activities that seek to improve patient care or clinical outcomes) differ from research activities that focus on creating new knowledge. Depending on the purpose, design, and generalizability of a quality improvement project, the applicant may need to submit the project to the IRB for approval.

Keywords: ethics; informed consent; institutional review board (IRB); quality improvement; research.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Stucky CH, De Jong MJ, Rodriguez JA. A five-step evidence-based practice primer for perioperative RNs. AORN J. 2020;112(5):506-515.
    1. Nicholson PF, Hamlin L, Duff J, Gillespie BM, Williams C. Identifying research priorities for improving patient care in the perioperative environment: a descriptive cross-sectional study. J Perioper Nurs. 2020;33(4):e29-e37.
    1. Stannard D. Learning from lessons for change. AORN J. 2020;112(5):502-504.
    1. Buelow PA. The institutional review board: a brief history of attempts to protect human subjects in research. Clin Nurse Spec. 2011;25(6):277-280.
    1. Arslanian-Engoren C, Moser DK. Bringing balance to institutional review board oversight in human subject research. J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2013;28(6):495-497.

LinkOut - more resources