Slow excitatory synaptic currents generated by AMPA receptors
- PMID: 34587649
- DOI: 10.1113/JP280877
Slow excitatory synaptic currents generated by AMPA receptors
Abstract
Decades of literature indicate that the AMPA-type glutamate receptor is among the fastest acting of all neurotransmitter receptors. These receptors are located at excitatory synapses, and conventional wisdom says that they activate in hundreds of microseconds, deactivate in milliseconds due to their low affinity for glutamate and also desensitize profoundly. These properties circumscribe AMPA receptor activation in both space and time. However, accumulating evidence shows that AMPA receptors can also activate with slow, indefatigable responses. They do so through interactions with auxiliary subunits that are able promote a switch to a high open probability, high-conductance 'superactive' mode. In this review, we show that any assumption that this phenomenon is limited to heterologous expression is false and rather that slow AMPA currents have been widely and repeatedly observed throughout the nervous system. Hallmarks of the superactive mode are a lack of desensitization, resistance to competitive antagonists and a current decay that outlives free glutamate by hundreds of milliseconds. Because the switch to the superactive mode is triggered by activation, AMPA receptors can generate accumulating 'pedestal' currents in response to repetitive stimulation, constituting a postsynaptic mechanism for short-term potentiation in the range 5-100 Hz. Further, slow AMPA currents span 'cognitive' time intervals in the 100 ms range (theta rhythms), of particular interest for hippocampal function, where slow AMPA currents are widely expressed in a synapse-specific manner. Here, we outline the implications that slow AMPA receptors have for excitatory synaptic transmission and computation in the nervous system.
Keywords: auxiliary subunits; glutamate; kinetics; short-term plasticity; synaptic diversity.
© 2021 The Authors. The Journal of Physiology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of The Physiological Society.
References
-
- Arnth-Jensen N, Jabaudon D, & Scanziani M (2002). Cooperation between independent hippocampal synapses is controlled by glutamate uptake. Nat Neurosci 5, 325-331.
-
- Balmer TS, Borges-Merjane C & Trussell LO (2021). Incomplete removal of extracellular glutamate controls synaptic transmission and integration at a cerebellar synapse. Elife 10, e63819.
-
- Bats C, Soto D, Studniarczyk D, Farrant M & Cull-Candy SG (2012). Channel properties reveal differential expression of TARPed and TARPless AMPARs in stargazer neurons. Nat Neurosci 15, 853-861.
-
- Berteau S & Bullock D (2020). Simulations reveal how M-currents and memory-based inputs from CA3 enable single neuron mismatch detection for EC3 inputs to the CA1 subfield of hippocampus. J Neurophysiol 124, 544-556.
-
- Bijak M, Jarolimek W & Misgeld U (1991). Effects of antagonists on quisqualate and nicotinic receptor-mediated currents of midbrain neurones in culture. Br J Pharmacol 102, 699-705.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources