Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Sep 13:12:695116.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.695116. eCollection 2021.

Did Dog Domestication Contribute to Language Evolution?

Affiliations

Did Dog Domestication Contribute to Language Evolution?

Antonio Benítez-Burraco et al. Front Psychol. .

Abstract

Different factors seemingly account for the emergence of present-day languages in our species. Human self-domestication has been recently invoked as one important force favoring language complexity mostly via a cultural mechanism. Because our self-domestication ultimately resulted from selection for less aggressive behavior and increased prosocial behavior, any evolutionary or cultural change impacting on aggression levels is expected to have fostered this process. Here, we hypothesize about a parallel domestication of humans and dogs, and more specifically, about a positive effect of our interaction with dogs on human self-domestication, and ultimately, on aspects of language evolution, through the mechanisms involved in the control of aggression. We review evidence of diverse sort (ethological mostly, but also archeological, genetic, and physiological) supporting such an effect and propose some ways of testing our hypothesis.

Keywords: aggression; cognitive disorders; dog domestication; human self-domestication; language evolution; prosociality.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
A graphical summary of our model of language evolution under the forces of self-domestication and the hypothesized feedback effect with dog domestication. The images of the wolf and the dog are from Wikipedia (CC BY-SA 3.0).

Similar articles

References

    1. Albuquerque N., Guo K., Wilkinson A., Savalli C., Otta E., Mills D. (2016). Dogs recognize dog and human emotions. Biol. Lett. 12:20150883. 10.1098/rsbl.2015.0883 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Amici F., Sánchez-Amaro A., Sebastián-Enesco C., Cacchione T., Allritz M., Salazar-Bonet J., et al. (2019). The word order of languages predicts native speakers’ working memory. Sci. Rep. 9:1124. 10.1038/s41598-018-37654-9 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Andari E., Nishitani S., Kaundinya G., Caceres A. G., Michael J., Morrier O., et al. (2020). Epigenetic modification of the oxytocin receptor gene: implications for autism symptom severity and brain functional connectivity. Neuropsychopharmacology 45 1150–1158. 10.1038/s41386-020-0610-6 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Andics A., Gábor A., Gácsi M., Faragó T., Szabó D., Miklósi Á. (2016). Neural mechanisms for lexical processing in dogs. Science 353 1030–1032. 10.1126/science.aaf3777 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Arai J. A., Li S., Hartley D. M., Feig L. A. (2009). Transgenerational rescue of a genetic defect in long-term Potentiation and memory formation by juvenile enrichment. J. Neurosci. 29 1496–1502. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5057-08.2009 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources