Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Sep 8;28(5):3488-3506.
doi: 10.3390/curroncol28050301.

Virtual Care in Patients with Cancer: A Systematic Review

Affiliations

Virtual Care in Patients with Cancer: A Systematic Review

Simron Singh et al. Curr Oncol. .

Abstract

Virtual care in cancer care existed in a limited fashion globally before the COVID-19 pandemic, mostly driven by geographic constraints. The pandemic has required dramatic shifts in health care delivery, including cancer care. We conducted a systematic review of comparative studies evaluating virtual versus in-person care in patients with cancer. Embase, APA PsycInfo, Ovid MEDLINE, and the Cochrane Library were searched for literature from January 2015 to 6 August 2020. We adhered to PRISMA guidelines and used the modified GRADE approach to evaluate the data. We included 34 full-text publications of 10 randomized controlled trials, 13 non-randomized comparative studies, and 5 ongoing randomized controlled trials. Evidence was divided into studies that provide psychosocial or genetic counselling and those that provide or assess medical and supportive care. The limited data in this review support that in the general field of psychological counselling, virtual or remote counselling can be equivalent to in-person counselling. In the area of genetic counselling, telephone counselling was more convenient and noninferior to usual care for all outcomes (knowledge, decision conflict, cancer distress, perceived stress, genetic counseling satisfaction). There are few data for clinical outcomes and supportive care. Future research should assess the role of virtual care in these areas. Protocol registration: PROSPERO CRD42020202871.

Keywords: cancer; phone; systematic review; telehealth; telemedicine; teleoncology; videoconferencing; virtual care.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
PRISMA Flow Diagram.

References

    1. Higgins J.P.T., Thomas J., Chandler J., Cumpston M., Li T., Page M., Welch V.A. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 6.1. Cochrane; London, UK: 2020. [(accessed on 11 March 2021)]. Updated September 2020. Available online: www.training.cochrane.org/handbook.
    1. Sterne J.A.C., Savović J., Page M.J., Elbers R.G., Blencowe N.S., Boutron I., Cates C.J., Cheng H.-Y., Corbett M.S., Eldridge S.M., et al. RoB 2: A revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ. 2019;366:l4898. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l4898. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sterne J.A., Hernán M.A., Reeves B.C., Savović J., Berkman N.D., Viswanathan M., Henry D., Altman D.G., Ansari M.T., Boutron I., et al. ROBINS-I: A tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions. BMJ. 2016;355:i4919. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i4919. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Schünemann H., Brożek J., Guyatt G., Oxman A., editors. Handbook for Grading the Quality of Evidence and the Strength of Recommendations Using the GRADE Approach (Updated October 2013). GRADE Working Group, 2013. [(accessed on 11 March 2021)]. Available online: https://gdt.gradepro.org/app/handbook/handbook.html.
    1. Lleras de Frutos M., Medina J.C., Vives J., Casellas-Grau A., Marzo J.L., Borras J.M., Ochoa-Arnedo C. Video conference vs face-to-face group psychotherapy for distressed cancer survivors: A randomized controlled trial. Psychooncology. 2020;29:1995–2003. doi: 10.1002/pon.5457. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types