Pressure Injury Prevention for Complex Cardiovascular Patients in the Operating Room and Intensive Care Unit: A Quality Improvement Project
- PMID: 34591039
- PMCID: PMC8601672
- DOI: 10.1097/WON.0000000000000815
Pressure Injury Prevention for Complex Cardiovascular Patients in the Operating Room and Intensive Care Unit: A Quality Improvement Project
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of our project was to examine the effect of an alternating pressure (AP) overlay on hospital-acquired pressure injury (HAPI) in high-risk cardiovascular surgical patients.
Participants and setting: This quality improvement (QI) initiative was conducted in a core group of 8 cardiovascular operating room (OR) suites and 1 cardiovascular surgical critical intensive care unit (ICU) in a large Indiana-based academic hospital. The sample comprised adult patients who underwent complex cardiovascular surgical procedures and those in the cardiovascular surgical ICU with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), ventricular assistive device (VAD), and undergoing heart and/or lung transplant, or open chest procedures.
Approach: The AP overlay was placed on OR cardiovascular foam surfaces and on selected ICU support surfaces for patients who met inclusion criteria. We used a pre/postcomparative QI design to assess outcomes including OR-related HAPI rates, ICU aggregate unit HAPI data, related costs, and staff satisfaction during the 3-month project period.
Outcomes: Operating room-related HAPIs were reduced from 8/71 (11%) preintervention to 0/147 (0%) postintervention (P = .008), resulting in a cost avoidance of $323,048 and positive staff satisfaction (mean = 3.85; 1- to 4-point Likert scale). No adverse outcomes occurred. Although not significant, ICU HAPI rates decreased from 10 to 7 pre/postintervention (P = .29), demonstrating a 14% HAPI reduction with a cost avoidance of $121,143. The ICU incidence density decreased from 3.57 to 3.24; however, there was no decrease in ICU monthly unit prevalence. Critical care staff satisfaction was positive (mean = 2.95; 1- to 4-point Likert scale) with most staff members preferring the AP overlay to a fluid immersion surface. A cost savings of 48% (AP overlay vs fluid immersion rental) was identified in the ICU.
Implications for practice: We achieved fewer HAPIs and reduced costs and observed positive staff satisfaction, along with no adverse events with the use of the AP overlay. Further research is needed to determine the safety and efficacy of this device for this pressure injury prevention option for immobile patients in both the OR and the ICU.
Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the Wound, Ostomy, and Continence Nurses Society.
Figures
References
-
- Park S, Park H, Hwang H. Development and comparison of predictive models for pressure injuries in surgical patients: a retrospective case-control study. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2019;46(4):291–297. - PubMed
-
- Padula W, Black J, Davidson P, Kang S, Pronovost P. Adverse effects of the Medicare PSI-90 hospital penalty system on revenue-neutral hospital-acquired conditions. J Patient Saf. 2018;16(2):e97–e102. - PubMed
-
- Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ). AHRQ National Scorecard on Hospital-Acquired Conditions: Updated Baseline Rates and Preliminary Results 2014-2016. Rockville, MD: AHRQ; 2018.
-
- Chen HL, Chen XY, Wu J. The incidence of pressure ulcers in surgical patients of the last 5 years: a systematic review. Wounds. 2012;24(9):234–241. - PubMed
-
- Cox J. Predictors of pressure ulcers in adult critical care patients. Am J Crit Care. 2011;20(5):364–375. doi:10.4037/ajcc2011934. - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
