Mortality risk for different presenting complaints amongst older patients assessed with the Manchester triage system
- PMID: 34591279
- DOI: 10.1007/s41999-021-00568-3
Mortality risk for different presenting complaints amongst older patients assessed with the Manchester triage system
Abstract
Purpose: Older people often present to the Emergency Department with nonspecific complaints. We aimed (1) to examine characteristics of older patients presenting to the ED triaged with the presentational flowchart 'unwell adult' of the Manchester triage system (MTS) and (2) to assess the different mortality and admission rates among triage categories.
Methods: Retrospective cohort study including all consecutive patients aged 70 years and older who visited the ED of a tertiary care hospital in the Netherlands during a 1-year period. The primary outcome was 30-day mortality. Secondary outcomes were 7-day mortality, hospital admission and ED length of stay.
Results: 4255 patients were included in this study. Mean age was 78 years (IQR 73.9-83.4) and 2098 were male (49.3%). The MTS presentational flowchart 'unwell adult' was the most commonly used flowchart (n = 815, 19.3%). After the infrequent flowchart 'major trauma' (n = 9, 13.8%), 'unwell adult' had the highest 30-day mortality (n = 88, 10.8%). When compared to all other flowcharts, patients assigned as 'unwell adult' have significantly higher 30-day mortality rates (OR 1.89 (95%CI 1.46-2.46), p = < 0.001), also when adjusted for age, gender and triage priority (OR 1.75 (95%CI 1.32-2.31), p = < 0.001). Patients from the 'unwell adult' flowchart had the highest hospital admission rate (n = 540, 66.3%), and had among the longest ED length of stay.
Conclusions: Older ED patients are most commonly assigned the presentational flowchart 'unwell adult' when using the MTS. Patients in this category have the highest non-trauma mortality and highest hospital admission rates when compared to other presenting complaints.
Keywords: Emergency department; Manchester triage system; Mortality; Non-specific complaints; Older patients; Triage.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to European Geriatric Medicine Society.
Comment in
-
Triage tools: a cautious (and critical) view towards their use in old patients.Eur Geriatr Med. 2022 Apr;13(2):319-322. doi: 10.1007/s41999-021-00572-7. Eur Geriatr Med. 2022. PMID: 34609734 No abstract available.
References
-
- Kuriyama A, Urushidani S, Nakayama T (2017) Five-level emergency triage systems: variation in assessment of validity. Emerg Med J 34(11):703–710. https://doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2016-206295 - DOI
-
- Mackway-Jones K (1997) Manchester Triage Group: emergency triage. BMJ Publishing Group, London
-
- Parenti N, Reggiani ML, Iannone P, Percudani D, Dowding D (2014) A systematic review on the validity and reliability of an emergency department triage scale, the Manchester Triage System. Int J Nurs Stud 51(7):1062–1069. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2014.01.013 - DOI
-
- Nonnenmacher CL, Pires AUB, Moraes VM, Lucena AF (2017) Factors that influence care priority for chest pain patients using the manchester triage system. J Clin Nurs. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.14011 - DOI
-
- Graff I, Goldschmidt B, Glien P, Dolscheid-Pommerich RC, Fimmers R, Grigutsch D (2017) Validity of the Manchester Triage System in patients with sepsis presenting at the ED: a first assessment. Emerg Med J 34(4):212–218. https://doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2015-205309 - DOI
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources