Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Sep 30;9(9):CD001097.
doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001097.pub4.

Surgery for deep venous insufficiency

Ravi Raj Goel  1 , Simon C Hardy  1 , Tamara Brown  2
Affiliations

Surgery for deep venous insufficiency

Ravi Raj Goel et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. .

Abstract

Background: Chronic deep venous insufficiency is caused by incompetent vein valves, blockage of large-calibre leg veins, or both; and causes a range of symptoms including recurrent ulcers, pain and swelling. Most surgeons accept that well-fitted graduated compression stockings (GCS) and local care of wounds serve as adequate treatment for most people, but sometimes symptoms are not controlled and ulcers recur frequently, or they do not heal despite compliance with conservative measures. In these situations, in the presence of severe venous dysfunction, surgery has been advocated by some vascular surgeons. This is an update of the review first published in 2000.

Objectives: To assess the effects of surgical management of deep venous insufficiency on ulcer healing and recurrence, complications of surgery, clinical outcomes, quality of life (QoL) and pain.

Search methods: The Cochrane Vascular Information Specialist searched the Cochrane Vascular Specialised Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase and CINAHL databases, and the WHO ICTRP and ClinicalTrials.gov trials registries to 23 June 2020.

Selection criteria: We considered randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of surgical treatment versus another surgical procedure, usual care or no treatment, for people with deep venous insufficiency.

Data collection and analysis: Two review authors independently assessed trials for inclusion, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias with the Cochrane risk of bias tool. We evaluated the certainty of the evidence using GRADE. We were unable to pool data due to differences in outcomes reported and how these were measured. Outcomes of interest were ulcer healing and recurrence, complications of surgery, clinical changes, QoL and pain.

Main results: We included four RCTs (273 participants) comparing valvuloplasty plus surgery of the superficial venous system with surgery of the superficial venous system for primary valvular incompetence. Follow-up was two to 10 years. All included studies investigated primary valve incompetence. No studies investigated other surgical procedures for the treatment of people with deep venous insufficiency or surgery for secondary valvular incompetence or venous obstruction. The certainty of the evidence was downgraded for risk of bias concerns and imprecision due to small numbers of included trials, participants and events. None of the studies reported ulcer healing or ulcer recurrence. One study included 27 participants with active venous ulceration at the time of surgery; the other three studies did not include people with ulcers. There were no major complications of surgery, no incidence of deep vein thrombosis and no deaths reported (very low-certainty evidence). All four studies reported clinical changes but the data could not be pooled due to different outcome measures and reporting of the data. Two studies assessed clinical changes using subjective and objective measurements, as specified in the clinical, aetiological, anatomical and pathophysiological (CEAP) classification score (low-certainty evidence). One study reported mean CEAP severity scores and one study reported change in clinical class using CEAP. At baseline, the mean CEAP severity score was 18.1 (standard deviation (SD) 4.4) for limbs undergoing external valvuloplasty with surgery to the superficial venous system and 17.8 (SD 3.4) for limbs undergoing surgery to the superficial venous system only. At three years post-surgery, the mean CEAP severity score was 5.2 (SD 1.6) for limbs that had undergone external valvuloplasty with surgery to the superficial venous system and 9.2 (SD 2.6) for limbs that had undergone surgery to the superficial venous system only (low-certainty evidence). In another study, participants with progressive clinical dynamics over the five years preceding surgery had higher rates of improvement in clinical condition in the treatment group (valvuloplasty plus ligation) compared with the control group (ligation only) (80% versus 51%) after seven years of follow-up. Participants with stable preoperative clinical dynamics demonstrated similar rates of improvement in both groups (95% with valvuloplasty plus ligation versus 90% with ligation only) (low-certainty evidence). One study reported disease-specific QoL using cumulative scores from a 10-item visual analogue scale (VAS) and reported that in the limited anterior plication (LAP) plus superficial venous surgery group the score decreased from 49 to 11 at 10 years, compared to a decrease from 48 to 36 in participants treated with superficial venous surgery only (very low-certainty evidence). Two studies reported pain. Within the QoL VAS scale, one item was 'pain/discomfort' and scores decreased from 4 to 1 at 10 years for participants in the LAP plus superficial venous surgery group and increased from 2 to 3 at 10 years in participants treated with superficial venous surgery only. A second study reported that 'leg heaviness and pain' was resolved completely in 36/40 limbs treated with femoral vein external valvuloplasty plus high ligation and stripping of the great saphenous vein (GSV) and percutaneous continuous circumsuture and 22/40 limbs treated with high ligation and stripping of GSV and percutaneous continuous circumsuture alone, at three years' follow-up (very low-certainty evidence).

Authors' conclusions: We only identified evidence from four RCTs for valvuloplasty plus surgery of the superficial venous system for primary valvular incompetence. We found no studies investigating other surgical procedures for the treatment of people with deep venous insufficiency, or that included participants with secondary valvular incompetence or venous obstruction. None of the studies reported ulcer healing or recurrence, and few studies reported complications of surgery, clinical outcomes, QoL and pain (very low- to low-certainty evidence). Conclusions on the effectiveness of valvuloplasty for deep venous insufficiency cannot be made.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

RRG: none.

SCH: has declared that he has received money in support for travel or accommodation to visit other vascular units to observe demonstrations of new venous stent insertions for deep venous obstruction. SH declares he is a Consultant Vascular Surgeon with interest in deep venous disease and its interventional/surgical treatment and also has an interest in the reorganisation of vascular services including the treatment of venous diseases. SH also declares he is Clinical Director of the Cumbria and Lancashire AAA Screening Programme.

TB: none.

Figures

1
1
Study flow diagram.
2
2
Risk of bias graph: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item presented as percentages across all included studies.
3
3
Risk of bias summary: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item for each included study.
1.1
1.1. Analysis
Comparison 1: Intervention versus control: trials on primary valvular incompetence, Outcome 1: Ambulatory venous pressure (AVP)
1.2
1.2. Analysis
Comparison 1: Intervention versus control: trials on primary valvular incompetence, Outcome 2: AVP with cuff application
1.3
1.3. Analysis
Comparison 1: Intervention versus control: trials on primary valvular incompetence, Outcome 3: Venous refill time (VRT)
1.4
1.4. Analysis
Comparison 1: Intervention versus control: trials on primary valvular incompetence, Outcome 4: VRT with cuff
1.5
1.5. Analysis
Comparison 1: Intervention versus control: trials on primary valvular incompetence, Outcome 5: Number of sites of incompetence
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Update of

References

References to studies included in this review

Belcaro 1993a {published data only}
    1. Belcaro G. Femoral vein valve repair with limited anterior plication (LAP). Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery 1993;34(5):395-8. - PubMed
Belcaro 1999 {published data only}
    1. Belcaro G, Nicolaides AN, Ricci A, Laurora G, Errichi BM, Christopoulos D, et al. External femoral vein valvuloplasty with limited anterior plication (LAP): a 10 year randomised follow up study. Angiology 1999;50(7):531-6. - PubMed
Makarova 2001 {published data only}
    1. Makarova NM, Lurie F, Hmelniker SM. Does surgical correction of the superficial femoral vein valve change the course of varicose disease? Journal of Vascular Surgery 2001;33(2):361-8. - PubMed
Wang 2006 {published data only}
    1. Wang SM, Hu ZJ, Li SQ, Huang XL, Ye CS. Effect of external valvuloplasty of deep vein in the treatment of chronic venous insufficiency of lower extremity. Chung-Hua Wai Ko Tsa Chih [Chinese Journal of Surgery] 2005;43(13):853-6. - PubMed
    1. Wang SM, Hu ZJ, Li SQ, Huang XL, Ye CS. Effect of external valvuloplasty of the deep vein in the treatment of chronic venous insufficiency of the lower extremity. Journal of Vascular Surgery 2006;44(6):1296-300. - PubMed

References to studies excluded from this review

Ktenidis 2002 {published data only}
    1. Ktenidis K, Tripathi R. In: European Society for Vascular Surgery Meeting, Turkey. September 2002.
Maksimović 2008 {published data only}
    1. Maksimović ZV. Ulcus venosum cruris – etiopathogenesis, clinical features and surgical treatment [Ulcus venosum cruris – etiopatogeneza, klinicka slika i hirursko lecewe]. Srpski Arhiv za Celokupno Lekarstvo 2008;136(Suppl 2):97-108. - PubMed
Pierik 1997 {published data only}
    1. Pierik EG, Urk H, Hop WC, Wittens CH. Endoscopic versus open subfascial division of incompetent perforating veins in the treatment of venous leg ulceration: a randomized trial. Journal of Vascular Surgery 1997;26(6):1049-54. - PubMed
Rass 2012 {published data only}
    1. Rass K, Frings N, Glowacki P, Hamsch C, Graber S, Vogt T, et al. Comparable effectiveness of endovenous laser ablation and high ligation with stripping of the great saphenous vein: two-year results of a randomized clinical trial (RELACS study). Archives of Dermatology 2012;148:49-58. - PubMed
Sybrandy 2001 {published data only}
    1. Sybrandy JE, Gent WB, Pierik EG, Wittens CH. Endoscopic versus open subfascial division of incompetent perforating veins in the treatment of venous leg ulceration: long-term follow-up. Journal of Vascular Surgery 2001;33(5):1028-32. - PubMed

Additional references

Bauer 1948
    1. Bauer G. The aetiology of leg ulcers and their treatment by resection of the popliteal veins. Journal International de Chirurgie 1948;8:937-67.
Beebe 1996
    1. Beebe HG, Bergan JJ, Bergqvist D, Eklöf B, Eriksson I, Goldman MP, et al. Classification and grading of chronic venous disease in the lower limbs: a consensus statement. Vascular Surgery 1996;30(1):5-11. - PubMed
Belcaro 1993b
    1. Belcaro G, Labropoulos N, Christopoulos D, Vasdekis S, Laurora G, Cesarone MR, et al. Noninvasive tests in venous insufficiency. Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery 1993;34(1):3-11. - PubMed
Browse 1998
    1. Browse NL, Burnand KG, Wilson N, Irvine A. Diseases of the Veins. London (UK): Edward Arnold, 1998.
Bryce 2018
    1. Bryce Y, Kumar S, Booth P. Attempts at the creation of a prosthetic venous valve in the treatment of chronic venous disease. Biomedical Journal of Scientific and Technical Research 2018;12(3):9242-4.
Chatterjee 2012
    1. Chatterjee SS. Venous ulcers of the lower limb: where do we stand? Indian Journal of Plastic Surgery 2012;45(2):266-74. - PMC - PubMed
Covidence [Computer program]
    1. Veritas Health Innovation Covidence. Melbourne, Australia: Veritas Health Innovation, Version accessed 27 March 2021. Available at covidence.org.
Eriksson 1988
    1. Eriksson I, Almgren B. Surgical reconstruction of incompetent deep vein valves. Upsala Journal of Medical Science 1988;93(2):139-43. - PubMed
Gloor 1997
    1. Gloor B, Largiader J. Surgical treatment of deep venous reflux. European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery 1997;13(2):98-100. - PubMed
Halliday 1985
    1. Halliday P, Harris J, May J. Femoral-femoral cross-over grafts (Palma operation): a long term follow-up study. In: Bergan JJ, Yao JS, editors(s). Surgery of the Veins. New York (NY): Grune & Stratton, 1985:241-54.
Higgins 2011
    1. Higgins JP, Altman DG, Sterne JA, Cochrane Statistical Methods Group and the Cochrane Bias Methods Group. Chapter 8: Assessing risk of bias in included studies. In: Higgins JP, Green S, editor(s). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 (updated March 2011). The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available from training.cochrane.org/handbook/archive/v5.1/.
Jadad 1996
    1. Jadad AR, Moore RA, Carroll D, Jenkinson C, Reynolds DJ, Gavaghan DJ, et al. Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary? Controlled Clinical Trials 1996;17(1):1-12. - PubMed
Kistner 1980
    1. Kistner RL. Primary venous valve incompetence of the leg. American Journal of Surgery 1980;140(2):218-24. - PubMed
Lancet 1982
    1. Anonymous. Diagnosis and treatment of venous ulceration [editorial]. Lancet 1982;2(8292):247-8. - PubMed
Lefebvre 2011
    1. Lefebvre C, Manheimer E, Glanville J. Chapter 6: Searching for studies. In: Higgins JP, Green S, editor(s). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 (updated March 2011). The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available from training.cochrane.org/handbook/archive/v5.1/.
NICE 2007
    1. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Lower limb deep vein valve reconstruction for chronic deep venous incompetence. Interventional procedures guidance [IPG219]. www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ipg219 (accessed 5 July 2021).
O'Donnell 1987
    1. O'Donnell TF Jr, Mackey WC, Shepard AD, Callow AD. Clinical, haemodynamic, and anatomic follow-up of direct venous reconstruction. Archives of Surgery 1987;122(4):474-82. - PubMed
Perrin 2004
    1. Perrin M. Surgery for deep venous reflux in the lower limb. Journal des Maladies Vasculaires 2004;29(2):73-87. - PubMed
Porter 1995
    1. Porter JM, Moneta GL. International Consensus Committee on chronic venous disease. Reporting standards in venous disease: an update. Journal of Vascular Surgery 1995;21(4):635-45. - PubMed
Raju 1988
    1. Raju S, Fredericks R. Valve reconstruction procedures for non-obstructive venous insufficiency: rationale, techniques and results in 107 procedures with two- to eight-year follow-up. Journal of Vascular Surgery 1988;7(2):301-10. - PubMed
Schulz 1995
    1. Schulz KF, Chalmers I, Hayes RJ, Altman DG. Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials. JAMA 1995;273:408-12. - PubMed
Schünemann 2021
    1. Schünemann HJ, Higgins JP, Vist GE, Glasziou P, Akl EA, Skoetz N, et al. Chapter 14: Completing 'Summary of findings' tables and grading the certainty of the evidence. In: Higgins JP, Thomas J, Chandler J, Cumpston M, Li T, Page MJ, et al, editor(s). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions version 6.2 (updated February 2021). Cochrane, 2021. Available from www.training.cochrane.org/handbook.
Tien 2017
    1. Tien WH, Zhao X, Chen HY, Berwick ZC, Krieger JF, Chambers S, et al. Role of vessel-to-prosthesis size mismatch in venous valve performance. Journal of Vascular Surgery 2017;5(1):105-113.e1. - PubMed
Wilson 1991
    1. Wilson NM, Rutt DL, Browse NL. Repair and replacement of deep vein valves in the treatment of venous insufficiency. British Journal of Surgery 1991;78(4):388-94. - PubMed
Yavuz 2020
    1. Yavuz T, Acar AN, Yavuz K, Ekingen E. A retrospective study of deep vein insufficiency treatment device: ICT. Annals of Vascular Diseases 2020;13(3):255-60. - PMC - PubMed

References to other published versions of this review

Abidia 2000
    1. Abidia A, Hardy SC. Surgery for deep venous incompetence. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2000, Issue 2. Art. No: CD001097. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD001097] - DOI - PubMed
Goel 2015
    1. Goel RR, Abidia A, Hardy SC. Surgery for deep venous incompetence. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2015, Issue 2. Art. No: CD001097. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD001097.pub3] - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Hardy 2004
    1. Hardy SC, Riding G, Abidia A. Surgery for deep venous incompetence. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2004, Issue 3. Art. No: CD001097. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD001097.pub2] - DOI - PubMed

Publication types